Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: rickmichaels
Just paid 3.53 a gallon. a few weeks, maybe a month or so ago it was 2.99...
It can tank any day now.
2 posted on
03/06/2014 4:28:11 PM PST by
cableguymn
(It's time for a second political party.)
To: rickmichaels
Well, Obama might release some crude to drive the prices down and erode Russia’s profits a bit. Shame he didn’t allow the pipeline to go through. See that Obama? STupid decisions lead to stupid unintended consequences.
It’s mostly a Government game dude, they’re doing it with everything.
- Cattle lowest since 1950 because of inclement weather?
- Corn going up, inclement weather?
- Fresh Fruits and Vegatables going up, inclement weather?
- Pork, Chicken .... blah blah, inclement weather?
- Wheat and Soy
Think about it. Everything Obama has done has resulted in making it more expensive to live. They don’t want income redistribution, they just want everybody poor.
Get the picture? Somebody is reinforcing global warming on us.
3 posted on
03/06/2014 4:31:08 PM PST by
Usagi_yo
(Standardization is an Evolutionary dead end.)
To: thackney
6 posted on
03/06/2014 4:39:43 PM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: rickmichaels
What? Oh, sorry, my mind got stuck on that phrase “Incremental Gyrations” . Might be a good title for a novel.
To: rickmichaels
I guess Prince Hakeem will only be able to buy three Hennessey Venom GTs and two Rolls Royal Celestials next month instead of five.
11 posted on
03/06/2014 4:41:55 PM PST by
SkyPilot
To: rickmichaels
if gas ever tanks to 2.00 a gallon,then the economy will improve and millions more people will find work,then millions more people will vote GOP !!! what will Obama do?
To: rickmichaels; Squawk 8888; SunkenCiv
16 posted on
03/06/2014 4:51:48 PM PST by
fanfan
("If Muslim kids were asked to go to church on Sunday and take Holy Communion there would be war.")
To: rickmichaels
I’ll believe it when I pay for it at the pump.
19 posted on
03/06/2014 4:53:10 PM PST by
Colonel_Flagg
(Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
To: rickmichaels
Just got the heating bill for January. Astronomical.
21 posted on
03/06/2014 4:54:51 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: rickmichaels
I think he's full of it.
$25 crude would require a deflationary collapse and a reduction in demand of at least 40% worldwide. It would also require international calm.
I don't see all those lining up.
WORST CASE, $70 no matter how much we pump.
And, the producers are not dumb enough to produce TOO much. It's money in the ground for them. They can pump slower to milk every last dollar out of each barrel.
22 posted on
03/06/2014 4:55:14 PM PST by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: rickmichaels
25 posted on
03/06/2014 4:58:14 PM PST by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
To: rickmichaels
Odd article. Not a single reason as to
why oil might tank.
Odd responses. As yet, not a single reason why it won't.
27 posted on
03/06/2014 4:59:43 PM PST by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media -- IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: rickmichaels
Oil rises on colder weather, screams a headline one day, only to be followed the next by Crude edges down on inventory report.Pee coil! Pee coil! they cried.
29 posted on
03/06/2014 5:04:10 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
To: rickmichaels
"Youd almost think energy analysts have a roulette wheel of explanations they spin each time prices move a notch" It's called the "Narrative Falacy":
The narrative fallacy addresses our limited ability to look at sequences of facts without weaving an explanation into them, or, equivalently, forcing a logical link, an arrow of relationship upon them. Explanations bind facts together. They make them all the more easily remembered; they help them make more sense. Where this propensity can go wrong is when it increases our impression of understanding. Nassim Nicholas Taleb, The Black Swan
CNBC is an entire cable channel pretty much dedicated to the Narrative Falacy.
32 posted on
03/06/2014 5:11:02 PM PST by
mlo
To: rickmichaels
A price drop of that magnitude could put domestic production back a decade or more. Fracturing isn’t cheap
34 posted on
03/06/2014 5:24:38 PM PST by
Figment
To: rickmichaels
Nah...they will wait until a month before the next major election
36 posted on
03/06/2014 5:29:11 PM PST by
goodnesswins
(R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
To: rickmichaels; Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...
To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.
Canada Ping!
39 posted on
03/06/2014 5:36:54 PM PST by
Squawk 8888
(I'd give up chocolate but I'm no quitter)
To: rickmichaels
But if it tanks, new production will stop—especially the more expensive kinds of production.
48 posted on
03/06/2014 6:30:03 PM PST by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
To: rickmichaels
When QE infinity stops, the price will come down.
53 posted on
03/06/2014 7:18:04 PM PST by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: rickmichaels
"Why the price of oil may be about to tank"
The prise of fuel will fall shortly before the
November elections and hussein will credit his
misadministration policy for it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson