stupid idea! compressed air as an energy storage mechanism is extremely inefficient.
How does the compressed air get into the compressed air holder thingy? Probably takes a gas engine to pump it on there.
Yup. Air as a means to power a sailboat is about the only way it works.
Still takes gas/coal/nuke to compress the air otherwise and that WASTES energy. Far more efficient to use the gas/coal/nuke directly. AND less polluting because of it.
There is a diagram in the article. The energy stored in the compressed gas is created and transferred with hydraulics. The compressed air is trapped in what is referred to as a hydraulic accumulator. Efficient enough.
Are they worse that electric hybrids? High voltage, heavy metal, heavy vehicles carrying a lot more force when they crash than a non-hybrid, difficult to quench fires, toxic fumes, etc.
If the French can make a compressed air hybrid car work, more power to them! If they did, it would sure be a black eye to Government Motors.
-— stupid idea! compressed air as an energy storage
http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/smart-takes/in-india-an-air-powered-car/26429
Note that the efficiency claims only apply to urban driving -- stop-and-go driving, in other words. It all has to do with recapturing braking energy. The Peugeot would capture braking energy as compressed air. A compressor can capture short bursts of energy much faster than a battery can. electric hybrid (such as a Prius), because batteries can't store small bursts of energy as quickly as a compressor. The more braking energy that's captured and reused, the more efficient the vehicle. That doesn't work well on the open road, where there's little braking energy to recapture.
That's not going to stop them, particularly is there's gub'mint money involved.
I'm pretty sure this was tried in India about a decade ago, iirc.
India has been doing it for a while with no apparently problems.