If they already have reason to arrest the person, they can. They cannot arrest someone just to get him out of the way. And if someone else with control of the property THEN gives permission...yes, they can search.
Wrong. They can and do. You can be arrested merely for “resisting arrest”-—with no other charges against you.
You are either dishonest, a government employee, or hoping others here are naive.
can yuou not see the potential for abuse here? guy say no but the woman’s intimidated by the cops and says yes? then they can have afield day until they find something wrong and then arrest the guyb/c he dared to sayno to armed govt agents?
‘They cannot arrest someone just to get him out of the way. ‘
With all due respect, that is one of the most naive statements you’ve made on this thread.
You’ve been defending this decision to the hilt, and it seems you’ve been doing so due to your naive attitude towards police and other people. Both groups can screw you over royally, but you’re ignoring that.
Now, if you turn around and say you’re a cop, then I’d tell you that you’re just don’t belong in America.
Like another poster stated: yesterday, you had a specific freedom, today that freedom is gone.
That’s what you’re defending, a loss of freedom. That is the un-American part.