Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ramius

so now they will just arrest the person saying no and search.

hope you don’t say no.

how is this constitutional? you don’ t want a warantless search, so they arrest you for objecting, and then they can legally search because arresting you allows them to ignore your objection.


63 posted on 02/25/2014 6:03:23 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man
"so now they will just arrest the person saying no and search."

If they already have reason to arrest the person, they can. They cannot arrest someone just to get him out of the way. And if someone else with control of the property THEN gives permission...yes, they can search.

66 posted on 02/25/2014 6:06:31 PM PST by Mr Rogers (I sooooo miss America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man
so now they will just arrest the person saying no and search.

Saying no to a search is not and never has been probable cause for a search or an arrest.

76 posted on 02/25/2014 6:19:04 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson