From the now locked thread.
“I have no way of knowing because the image that I know is genuinely from the funeral and shows some of the interior of the casket doesn’t seem to match the photoshopped images.”
How do you know that the image is genuine?
“And I can’t help but wonder why they photoshopped the other images.”
That’s your opinion that the images are photoshopped, not an expert’s opinion. Have you done Error Level Analysis?
Try this site:
Better still hire a real forensic image analyst and stop the amateur stuff.
“the name under which it is claimed that she bought with cash a multi-million-dollar house in Florida shortly after her alleged death.”
This has been shown to be not true. The house is still on the market and the county assessor’s office show the last time it was sold was IIRC 2009.
“That is just one of the places where it is mentioned that a fake funeral”
How many were open casket funerals with a dead body in the casket like Fuddy’s?
“it was revealed that Michelle would be going back to DC.”
Didn’t she go back for her fiftieth birthday? Fuddy death cause announced - January 13; Michelle Obama 50th birthday January 17th. Do you really think that is strange? Sometimes a coincidence is just a coincidence.
“Means, motive, and opportunity. They were all there that day.”
As they would be on virtually any other day and without a cast of thousands.
The comment you were responding to is at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3155169/posts?page=240#240 , in a locked thread that nobody is going to see because they won’t have a way to get to it, except through the link here, which nobody will have a way to get to either...
The photo from the Diocese website seems genuine because it was taken while Abercrombie was speaking and the congregants were seated. I suppose that photo could be photoshopped as well, but if it had been photoshopped it would make sense for them to get rid of the discrepancies rather than show them.
We can’t even afford to keep our vehicles in running condition because of extensive medical tests for my daughter this year, so no matter what the armchair quarterbacks here at Free Republic have to say about it, I am doing the best that I can with what I have. Those who are actually in the battle will always be criticized by the couch potatoes who have invested nothing personal.
Michelle Obama flew back to DC for a White House screening of an educational movie that a guy who watches what the Obamas are up to via what the White House publishes knew nothing about until the same day that Fuddy’s cause of death was reported. http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2014/01/13/michelle-obama-return-hawaii-wednesday/
Interesting, that the actual Maui Police press release (seen at http://mauifeed.com/maui-news/breaking-maui-police-announce-state-health-director-loretta-fuddys-death-was-accidental/#comments) claims that the engine failure was at about 3:37pm. The coroner, in investigating the facts of the death, apparently didn’t even look at the surreal flurry of communications between the Honolulu Control Facility and the USCG within those 10 minutes after the crash happened at 3:27. In fact, they must not have looked at ANYTHING from the USCG, because within a couple days of the crash the USCG issued a press release saying that the crash was reported to them at 3:27. Wow.
Regarding the cash purchase of a home in Florida under the name of Deliana Antone, you don’t think that a government entity would hide a record when it was found that somebody in the public had identified somebody in Witsec through that record? The whole point of Witsec is that records are hidden and falsified so that it officially looks like everything is fine. That is the job of these people to do, at the command of law enforcement. I have no way of knowing whether those who claimed to copy what was on the page about that sale are telling the truth, but I do know that the story of the record changing after somebody realized the sale had been noticed is plausible if Witsec was involved in any way.
We have no way of knowing what was in that casket. A guy claiming to be a co-worker with Fuddy, a James Ah Lo, chewed me out on my blog in an ad hominem attack but declined to claim that he saw Fuddy in the casket, which would have been the reasonable thing to say if he wanted to refute my questions/skepticism. That omission seemed odd to me also.