Yaelle, have you looked at the images/questions I pinged you to earlier today? At http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3125646/posts?page=391#391 ?
Not one person has responded to me on any of those questions. Not one.
Those are very blurry pictures. What are you trying to find? There isn’t anything in them that looks like it doesn’t belong with them in the ocean after surviving a plane crash.
The foot is Fuddy’s and makes sense with the way she is lying. She is lying with her head on the right of most photos and her legs go toward the left and closer to the camera.
I saw your photos but why would anyone ever have to pick out anything in those blurs? To what purpose? I don’t think but I could be wrong that desperately searching for cause of death in those grainy images will bring you satisfaction. I don’t see how.
Because to do so would involve going down the rabbit hole of your wacky conspiracy and no sane person could be bothered to do that. The problem is that every day your theory changes - nobody can keep up.
You started off by asserting that Fuddy was murdered in the water, and her open casket funeral attended my hundreds of mourners and filmed by two news stations was a fake funeral with no body in the casket, instead an urn containing her ashes. Despite catholics rarely being cremated.
You also claimed that Microsoft hacked your computer and was communicating directly with you on this issue. It turned out to be standard Microsoft error messages!
Then you tried to prove there was mystery extra passenger, that was presumably the assasin waiting to strike. And then it was proven that there was no extra passenger - it would have been darned hard to hide one in a plane that size - but I’m sure butter has ever been ona plane, so she may not realise that. It’s the only explanantion for her obtuseness on this issue.
When it was proven conclusively that it was Fuddy in the casket, you changed your theory to be a faked body. You claimed Fuddy at 5 ft 2 inches was too large to fit into a conventional coffin. When it was shown that all your calculations were incorrect because you were using Word to do image analysis (!). So then you fell back on something fishy about the folds of fabric on Fuddy’s casket hiding something - until you were shown images that disproved that too.
When there was no evidence for that theory, you change again. Now Fuddy was spirited away for her own safety and is still alive - so whose body did her CLOSE FAMILY say goodbye to in the open casket?
And then there was a mystery diver - such a mystery that he had no actual diving equipment about his person. And when it was proven that the image was a knee, and not a mystery diver, you changed again. Frankly I dont even know what your latest Fuddy unified theory is - perhaps you could lay it out for us. Is she dead, alive , hidden, buried ? And most of all, why?
You claim that whatever happened to Fuddy was becasue she was due to testify and blow the whole story wide open. But she wasn’t a defendant in any live case, and even if she had been, she would never have been compolled to testify outside of Hawaii. It’s just nonsense.
And now the latest - photos of the plane are faked because you can’t see a window. Except you are the only person insisting on not seeing the window - everyone else can.
So please give it up - everything you’ve said about this accident has turned out to be wrong, but you won’t stop until every shadow in every photograph is explained. That way madness lies. Stop before you get zotted for bringing your Infowars stuff here.