Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaNew
That’s not much of a debate.

No, not if one party simply refuses to accept the facts. When one side simply says, "I don't accept that," (in this case radiocarbon dating) there isn't much more room for intelligence to play a role. I don't think you can defend "intelligent design" with impenetrable denseness.

8 posted on 02/05/2014 10:04:11 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: John Valentine

So radiocarbon dating is infallible in your world view?

I tried being a Darwinist, but just didn’t have the faith required to believe that religion.

Pray America is Waking


12 posted on 02/05/2014 10:12:40 AM PST by bray (http://www.braylog.com/id47.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: John Valentine

Evidence of ID is everywhere, beginning with the purposeful makeup your own body, its DNA and all the intricate parts that work individually and together that make up a multi-functioning body. Proof of purposeful and intricate design is proof of a Designer.


20 posted on 02/05/2014 10:26:01 AM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson