Evidence of ID is overwhelming and undeniable, beginning with the purposeful makeup your own body, its DNA and the many intricate parts that work individually and together for a functioning body. Proof of purposeful and intricate design is proof of a Designer.
Darwinism requires transference from one major animal group to another of which there is no evidence.
Like that.
So it’s irrefutable that it was designed, but impossible for it to have been designed with the ability to evolve?
That's going a bit far, insofar as you use the word "proof." Evidence, yes. Proof? No.
Well stated, except that there is circumstantial evidence SUGGESTING ID, and it is abundant and compelling.
ID isn’t fact either. We haven’t proven it. We can say that for the Earth and all of its species to develop as they have through some sort of randomized series of events is so statistically unlikely that it is virtually impossible.
That’s the problem with modern science is that we extrapolate observations into facts, and we skip the experimentation, evaluation, and peer review.
When Einstein proved to himself that photons behaved like waves when you weren’t observing them to particles when you were. He never offered any explanation about why that was, but he proved it was happening.
He also proved entanglement was real. ‘Spooky action at a distance’ was real. Again, he never talked about how or why it was happening, just that it was.
I will say that trying to believe in evolution is tougher than believing in intelligent design, for me at least.
The math against this all being an accident is so compelling it is tough to get your mind around the degree to which it is impossible.
I also tend to think anything that breaks down and crashes in Roswell, NM and doesn’t provide for ‘rapid deceleration syndrome’ probably wasn’t responsible for setting the Earth and its various species in motion either.