Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CpnHook

>> that means the birth record does not contain any amendments which are not reflected on the WH version. Otherwise they wouldn’t match.

That’s is a ridiculous assertion.


323 posted on 02/05/2014 11:38:27 AM PST by Ray76 (How modern liberals think: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76
Correction

That’s is a ridiculous assertion.

324 posted on 02/05/2014 11:40:28 AM PST by Ray76 (How modern liberals think: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76
>> that means the birth record does not contain any amendments which are not reflected on the WH version. Otherwise they wouldn’t match.

That’s is a ridiculous assertion.

It's a non sequitur. He makes a habit of using those, and a lot of other logical fallacies.

By the way, did you notice the discussion regarding the alignment of the typewriter text? It's the most easy to understand proof of forgery that i've seen so far.

326 posted on 02/05/2014 11:49:34 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson