Thats is a ridiculous assertion.
It's a non sequitur. He makes a habit of using those, and a lot of other logical fallacies.
By the way, did you notice the discussion regarding the alignment of the typewriter text? It's the most easy to understand proof of forgery that i've seen so far.
He must have forgotten my previous post to him.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3119060/posts?page=238#238
Crook likely has been given a prepared script.