Cold Case Posse Asked Orly to Stand Down

Orly Tatz | 2/4/2014 | Orly Tatz

[GregNH]

Dear Orly:

I have been in daily contact with Detective Lieutenant Mike Zullo from the Sheriff Joe Arpaio Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Obama Fraud Investigation – sometimes twice daily.

I’m sure you also might have heard that Lt. Zullo is preparing to release his some evidence that will truly be universe-shattering, and the knowledge we have is truly something you’re not going to be ready for.

This will absolutely, definitely change the eligibility landscape by 10,000%.

Mike has asked me to communicate with you that the new evidence – which, let me tell you, is so all-encompassingly gigantic, so incredibly huge – that we were hoping we could ask you to cooperate on one front.

Now, since we’ve all been vindicated 1,000% on the birth certificate issue, since Lt. Zullo’s forensic investigation has been so comprehensive, it’s really irrelevant compared to the new, shocking & completely emasculating evidence. The birth certificate is truly no longer of any real concern.

And we feel that way also about the Social Security Number issue.

Mike said he was slightly embarrassed but he feels as though there might be some unnecessary friction between you two, even though we all share the same goals, and that we and the posse support all the work you’ve done over the years.

But we would like to request that you stand down with regard to your ongoing court cases, which appear to have already run their course, you must admit. I cannot overstate the importance that your cooperation will bring to the disclosure of this essential information.

If so, we’d request that these court proceedings be respectfully closed by March 19, when Lt. Zullo and Sheriff Arpaio and I will make our announcement. And believe me – it’s going to be the most incredible, universe-shattering thing you’ve ever heard!

Mike said he’s confident that you’ll cooperate, as we bring to a close this horrible chapter in our fine, Christian country to a close.

Thank you in advance, Dr. Taitz. It will be a pleasure to watch Mr. Whoever-he-is be taken where he needs to be taken.

With our most humble respect,

The Rev. Dr. Carl Gallups, M.Div. ppsimmons Radio Ministry http://www.carlgallups.com WEBY 1330 a.m. Freedom Friday

[CpnHook]

You don't do much to hide the fact that you are an Obot - do you?

If by "Obot" you mean "someone who notes that Birther arguments have failed and explains the various reasons why they have failed," then, yes, I am an "Obot." I note that label has been hung on a whole lot of others, even attempts on some Freepers with long histories here.

If by "Obot" you mean someone who defends anything or everything Obama has done, then, no, I am not that.

[CpnHook]

It is apparent that you regard yourself as knowledgeable and intelligent, but the notion that a form printed on a printing press must conform to the constraints of a typewriter implies either a level of ignorance or stupidity too great to support such a belief in yourself.

And if that's what I was asserting I would agree with that assessment. But since that's not what I said, you can torch the strawman till it burns bright and I'll just roll my eyes.

Note the obvious curves of the image along the entire left margin. The original birth certificate (being on a flat sheet of paper) would not show this curvature, so it's apparent that there is distortion to the image incurred in the copying/scanning processes. This is further seen in observing that the typeset lines (which should be perfectly horizontal) and Moncton's overlay lines (which should be perfectly horizontal) should be perfectly parallel in all points. But they aren't.

The distortion added in the copying/scanning process makes it pointless to then overlay horizontal lines and claim (based on this single instance of using that technique) that it proves something.

[little jeremiah]

I don’t have TV/radio so my news intake is very narrow...

I have noticed a lot of Dems retiring.

I am sure they do not want the stink of Zero to taint them but...TOO LATE!

Maybe rumblings of things about to fall apart are making them skeered. Also the fear of subpoenas and all that.

[MMaschin]

LOL!


Pat, you're so funny!

[MMaschin]

What’s ironic, is how bad you are at IT.

[Ray76]

>> So you’re supposing that there exists for purposes of making a verification two versions of a record, an original and an amended version, and that the custodian is stating information “matches” because he’s comparing what’s proffered to the original and disregarding the amendment(s)?

No. There is one record containing original data and amendment(s).

Nice try at obfuscation. Roll again.

[Ray76]

>> Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.

The only record provided by Hawaii to an official of any other state is Onaka’s letter.

[Red Steel]

So go argue with the Framers. But the Constitution as written means you have one mighty weak argument here.

So back for another days pay to troll for Obama.

Crook, here's the answer to the same question down the thread that I answered to you, and now again.

"No Crook, it's not about the US Constitution in this instance. It's about Hawaiian officials using legalize and parsing to cover their butts. We see Onaka did not use the same language that are on genuine HI long form birth certificate. Hawaii had no real trust in the information they put forth that it is truthful."

Certain Hawaiian DoH officials use absurdly loose laws to BS the public. Their lying has nothing to do with the Founders or the US Constitution.

[Red Steel]

Bill Bryan, the disbarred attorney and certified moon bat iis selling obamacare according to his twitter messages and profile..

I've seen him blow up the Internet. He's unstable.

[GregNH]

OK, now I am just a little suspicious. Carl Gallups is aware of the universe shattering news about Zippo, right? Well I came across this video, SHOCKER! Loretta Fuddy - The Cult of Subud - Barack Obama, which is posted by ppsimmons Jan 30th, presumably with that universe shattering knowledge. So at the end of this video he claims that the crack staff of ppsimmons found that Obama and the Subud cult leader look alike and then speaks of the coincidence of Subud being in Chicago, Hawaii, and Indonesia.

Why would one with the knowledge he has even post this video and speak of the coincidences that exist and finish by asking that very question, coincidence? "I have a feeling we will soon find out."

[GregNH]

Meant to ping you as well to the above post.

[Ray76]

I’ll grant you this, the verification/judicial notice strategy hatched in 2011 has thus far succeeded in concealing the whole truth. No doubt you congratulate yourself on this contemptible abuse of the judicial system.

[Ray76]

Because he babbles.

[Red Steel]

Oh yes, I’m aware of Fuddy’s linked to the same cult as the Obamas.

[GregNH]

My point was why hint that the Subud leader is Zippos Daddy when I presume Gallups knows who Daddy is?

[Red Steel]

My point was why hint that the Subud leader is Zippos Daddy when I presume Gallups knows who Daddy is?

Yep Gallups may know. ...How many daddies does Obama have? LoL!

[DiogenesLamp]

A custodian 50 or more years after the fact has no way to verify the circumstances of a document's creation or to verify its accuracy.

Once again, your belief in your own intellectual prowess is above demonstrated to be unwarranted.

A records keeper can most assuredly say whether or not a document is a "True and correct copy of the original record." It was a routine practice before the Obama kerfuffle came along.

Yet, such information on the public records is routinely accepted (in court and in other venues) based solely on the attestation of what the records say and without any further verification of accuracy.

It interests me not at all for you to note that the courts are amenable to sloppiness in their methodology. It certainly carries no weight here among the better informed regarding Hawaii's lax standards for birth records.

[MMaschin]

The only record provided by Hawaii to an official of any other state is Onaka’s letter.

That letter was not signed. It had Onaka's stamp on it - but it was initialed, indicating that Onaka DID NOT place the stamp on the document.

It would not have any legal weight, because it's not an official document. It was not signed, stamped, or sealed by ANY state official, therefore it would not be admissible in a court of law.

[Red Steel]

It would not have any legal weight, because it's not an official document. It was not signed, stamped, or sealed by ANY state official, therefore it would not be admissible in a court of law.

Nice observation. :-)

[DiogenesLamp]

And if that's what I was asserting I would agree with that assessment.

Here is your original statement below.

"By the same 'reasoning,' one would have to conclude that the lines on the original form were fabricated, since they don't consistently stay even with Moncton's grid.

Yes, that's what you were asserting; That because the lines on a printed form didn't correspond to the position restrictions of a typewriter, the original form must therefore be fabricated.

It was a ill thought out attempt to grasp at another straw, no doubt destined to be assembled with others into your own straw man. As for the rest of your claim, let's look at the image again.

The bending of the text at the left does not constitute a serious explanation for why the typewriter letters do no fall where they should on the right. By the center of the page, any distortion introduced by bending has become insignificant. A typewriter simply will not do what this document purports to show.

And now I can't wait to see what new nonsensical idea you are going to dream up next in your attempt to explain the discontinuity of the typed letters positions.