[AEMILIUS PAULUS]

No I did not say that in my original post. I did add it later. So what? Carrying in a bar necessarily follows from the doctrine of unlimited right to carry. People have the right to own and posses firearms in their homes and place of business they simply should not have an unrestricted right to carry at their pleasure. I'll bet in your entire life you and/or your family have never been seriously threatened.

Now answer the question: Are you in favor of the "right" to carry firearms into a bar? Do you favor the mixture of guns and liquor? I'll bet the questions are not answered.

[Sans-Culotte]

Now answer the question: Are you in favor of the "right" to carry firearms into a bar? Do you favor the mixture of guns and liquor? I'll bet the questions are not answered.

1.) No.

2.) No.

You lose your bet.

[William Tell]

AEMILIUS PAULUS said: Are you in favor of the "right" to carry firearms into a bar?

I'll give you an answer; unequivocally, YES!

There is no presumption that visiting a bar makes one less able to responsibly carry a firearm.

Are you in favor of outlawing the driving of a car to or from a bar?

How about liquor stores? How about restaurants that serve liquor?

Are you also in favor of the infringement of the right to carry within a 1000 feet of a school? Do you presume that no one would ever approach a school with a firearm unless they intended to murder children?

I presume you see no "slippery slope". Just how far down have you slid?