You mean like actually being able to protect themselves rather than being at the mercy of the mugger/rapist/murderer/burgler/etc. that otherwise would get away with his/her crime?
Guns are used much more often for self protection than they are to commit crimes. If convicted, this gent will be one of the 0.001% of concealed carry holders convicted of a committing a crime with his gun.
What part of the story here thus far reported and available to us clearly indicates the victim is in the ‘mugger/rapist/murderer/burgler/etc.’ category?
I am all in favor of being able to protect oneself with deadly force when the situation warrants. If the reports thus far are to be believed, loud music isn’t life threatening. Sorry, don’t buy it. I’m 2A, but I am not stupid, no matter what you think.