The article reads like a digital translation of some Euro-language.
I have one question about cold fusion - where’s the beef?
There’s been all this talk, all this hype, and yet there’s been not one machine made with this concept that can “produce” enough power to light a single light bulb.
No wonder people are skeptical.
That's the right question to ask!!
A few years before the "cold fusion" claim, another claim was made that violated a different theory, one that had been long established, won the Nobel Prize for three scientists, and had plenty of support from solid research. Yet this other claim, and the experimental evidence to support it was easily replicated by other (amazed) scientists, and eventually in the early 1990s, even by high school science fair projects. Thus new theories had to be developed to explain the evidence for high-temperature superconductors which violated the old BCS theory of superconductivity.
Over the last quarter century, "cold fusion" has failed to produce even a fraction of similar experimental results with any data above background noise. Thus "cold fusion" joins other similar claims as a "pathological science."
Growing.
"There’s been all this talk, all this hype, and yet there’s been not one machine made with this concept that can “produce” enough power to light a single light bulb."
Not true. Several devices have produced HUGE amounts of energy, far more than needed to light a single bulb. The problem is that the energy cannot (yet) be delivered on demand.
"No wonder people are skeptical."
Only those who haven't studied the data available on the subject.
“I have one question about cold fusion - where’s the beef?”
Kevmo gets all his LENR info from Jennifer.
Jennifer also pimps a steam engine. Kevmo’s famous Purdue LENR phyicist is a consultant for ...... THE STEAM ENGINE!
What a nice web they weave ...
Funny videos ...
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/Failure-of-Rossis-Energy-Catalyzer-Caught-on-Video.shtml
I have one question about cold fusion - where’s the beef?
***You mean, 14000 replications isn’t “beef” enough for you? Or the leaders in Instrumentation, Scientific Instruments, saying that there is a verified Anomalous Heat Event here after reviewing 150 replications? Or that Ross has sold at least some of his IP for $20M? Where does “Beef” begin and Baloney end? Because at this point, NO ONE wants the Controlled-Hot-Fusion IP, we’ve lost hundreds of $billions of taxpayer money to that fraud, and they’re STILL quoting a 50 year corner-turn. Now, talk about a REAL scam. Where’s the beef there?
There’s been all this talk, all this hype, and yet there’s been not one machine made with this concept that can “produce” enough power to light a single light bulb.
***You just haven’t been following the latest developments such as Hagelstein’s NANOR demo which lasted 5 months last year and his class had a demo this year for any skeptic to come along and show us all how it’s a huge mistake or somesuch baloney.
No wonder people are skeptical.
***People who claim to be skeptical don’t seem to be able to address the 14000 times the F-P Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated. Huizenga was one of those hyperskeptopaths.