[Fester Chugabrew]

Thank you. That makes sense. In the scheme of things, it is difficult to find any research that is not tilted politically one way or another. In the case of citizen gun ownership, I cannot understand why it would *not* be in the interest of the NRA to bring to light incidences of accidents and abuse. I would think sound public policy would instill certain qualifications, among them personal training to be subsidized by . . . constitutionally informed producers.

[andyk]

I cannot understand why it would *not* be in the interest of the NRA to bring to light incidences of accidents and abuse. I would think sound public policy would instill certain qualifications, among them personal training to be subsidized by . . . constitutionally informed producers

What the heck are you talking about? Are you saying the RKBA should be constrained by government approved training? I think we have to part ways if that's the case.

[andyk]

I cannot understand why it would *not* be in the interest of the NRA to bring to light incidences of accidents and abuse. I would think sound public policy would instill certain qualifications, among them personal training to be subsidized by . . . constitutionally informed producers.

I'll ask again. Are you saying that free citizens should be required to obtain governmental training and approval prior to exercising their 2nd amendment rights?