Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise
Access points can be secured so that 'thieving neighbors' can't access your internet connection. Not only WPA, but most routers can restrict access to a list of trusted MAC addresses.

The NSA can get around that, but script kiddies and most others can't. The ones that can, have jobs and pay for their own internet access.

No network, wired or wireless is 100% secure. If you are doing something that sensitive, it should be on a computer not connected to a network at all.

/johnny

26 posted on 01/23/2014 7:53:31 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: JRandomFreeper

“No network, wired or wireless is 100% secure. If you are doing something that sensitive, it should be on a computer not connected to a network at all.”

I did not say that wired is 100% secure but what I do know is that it is MORE secure than wireless.

I have only one computer on the internet. The others are isolated. ;-)


31 posted on 01/23/2014 8:00:58 PM PST by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (What we need is to sucker the fedthugs into a "Tiananmen Square"-like incident on the National Mall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: JRandomFreeper

Exactly. You can restrict access to particular MACS.

Plus the regular 64/128 bit password phrase/encryption stuff.

My AP will also stop sending the SSID nodename out, so it shows up on non-secured devices, but shows up as “UNKNOWN”


45 posted on 01/23/2014 8:54:21 PM PST by djf (OK. Well, now, lemme try to make this clear: If you LIKE your lasagna, you can KEEP your lasagna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: JRandomFreeper

Dude you can spoof a mac


51 posted on 01/23/2014 9:06:54 PM PST by tophat9000 (Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: JRandomFreeper
The NSA can get around that, ...

People keep saying that, but it probably isn't true. Remember how they tried for years to prevent the export of the more advanced encryption types? Because they couldn't break it. They gave it up, I'm sure, not because they could finally break anything but because the whole exercise proved to be a waste of time. That horse left the barn already. Decent encryption keeps them out too except they have the advantage of just breaking in and physically tapping in behind the firewall. So wired or wireless won't make much difference.

63 posted on 01/23/2014 10:09:13 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson