Towards the extraction of ‘live’ electricity”: Report from Open Power Association

“Towards the extraction of ‘live’ electricity”: Report from Open Power Association [번역]

From Open Power Association Report OO6 by Ugo Abundo and Luciano Saporito, these excerpts are google translated from the original Italian:

Best wishes for the new year 2014 from the staff of hydrobetatron.org/Open Power! May you be peaceful and happy, and make the most of your projects in the spirit of “open” and sharing, possibilente …

Dear friends, In this latest report, compiled by Ugo Abundo, is communicated in an articulated manner the state of the art of the important work of our team.

In particular, it is shown that, as far as we are concerned, our attention is paid to all those theories, working hypotheses, and experimental ideas, even different, that through a clever synthesis can contribute to achieve the results that we hope for, namely: the discovery of a new energy, economic, inexhaustible and clean, for the welfare of ‘humanity and the survival of Planet Earth!

In particular, our research is oriented to the extraction and production of electricity (electric power) directly from LENR (from Plasma, the Zero Point Energy, etc.), with Overunity.

I do not hide the enormous difficulties faced by our work carried out only on voluntary basis, and in almost no financial aid from the institutions, and so on. While the waste of public money, and the depredations of all kinds, especially in our country, they are all on the agenda.

LoS-for-PeaceRecall that the logo refers to the meritorious and innovative activity and REVOLUTIONARY scientific methodology that is known as the “Live Open Science”, introduced in October 2012 by a group of researchers of the International Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project (MFMP) .

Their website, exclusively for the exchange of scientific information, has so far been visited by more than a million Internet users.

The metolologia of Live Open Science was also recently nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2014! More information is HERE.

Maybe some good soul wants to nominate even modest We Rircercatori of hydrobetatron.org Open Power for the Nobel Prize for Peace? Certainly this would help a lot also working on our new energy!

Francesco Celani has published “Improved understanding of self-sustained, sub-micrometric multicomposition surface Constantan wires interacting with H2 at high temperatures: experimental evidence of Anomalous Heat Effects”. For .pdf, click HERE

See our collection of articles, including “HOW MUCH ET INERTIA” by Stephen QUATTRINI and “Quantum Space Theory” (QST) and “THE ATTEMPT TO FLY HIGH NO MORE long overdue” by Ugo ABUNDO and Francis SANTANDREA, by clicking the “WALL” to address: http://www.hydrobetatron.org/articoli.html

“We are humble, but we develop our talents, without false modesty, always remembering that: to understand a poem must be Poets” –Luciano Saporito Open Power Association

***************************************************************************************

A Bridge on Knowledge – 2: Towards the extraction of ” live” electricity by Ugo Abundo of LENR Open Power Association

Google translated: The long period of silence after our meeting of Coherence 2013 Conference on 15 October has seen us working on three major parallel fronts:

the experimental set of cathodes that now allow “direct” energy balances in the reactor to be measured, the Calorimetric response times compatible with the demand for scientific precision, and the development of a special protocol of optimal loading of the cathodes, in tune with the functional constraints introduced by operations with the apparatus (pilot program). a powerful work coordinating the responsibilities that belong to the Association: to outline a route to a leap in quality of energy yields theorized about, and the study of solutions for the direct extraction of electrical energy from LENR any apparatus, to which the experimenters demonstrate performance in Overunity, if adaptable to the conceptual core set forth below (theoretical program). a separate design of experiments for new generation reactors that aim to build on theoretical indications and to come to integrate with the phenomenon of which must be an expression (pilot program).

The title deliberately recalls a paradigm exposed long ago to duet with Francis Santandrea on 22Passi, according to which the very different interpretations of this experimental research area can traced back to a common central core whose identification and investigation not only promise to improve the understanding of said specific interpretations, but give rise to a design “synergistic” that is enriched with all aspects and should especially avoid the risk of phenomena antagonists.

In this ambitious goal are collaborating, directly or with their previous work, Francesco Celani, Antonella De Ninny, Fabio Cardone, Santandrea by Francesco Domenico Cirillo, Luciano Saporito, Paola Pieravanti, Michele Di Lecce with Alessandro Burgognoni, in Ugo Abundo and many other precious companions on this journey.

For the first point, it refers to a subsequent communication, to be issued at the completion of the experimental campaign in progress.

As for the second and third front, we have the pleasure to present the following preview for readers!

Conceptual core We recall the same name as in the previous post we http://22passi.blogspot.it/2012/09/il-ponte-della-conoscenza-post-di-ugo.html [translate]including different types of experiments integrating mainly in the context of a metal matrix condensed capable of accepting hydrogen in the presence of a driving force for loading (pressure, voltage , etc.) and subjected to stresses (plasma, laser, ultrasound , etc. .), also using additives that catalyze one or more steps of the reactions.

He spoke to outline the equipment as triodes generalized (if any third electrode for adjustment) proposing to introduce, if they are not already ‘ constructively present, a cathode (metal matrix), an anode, an interelectrode voltage, a voltage intracatodica, half conductor (electrolyte or ionized gas, eg. hydrogen).

To give a concrete example of adaptation to the paradigm suggested, in a nanostructured (or cathode monolithic, metal layers, powder or composite) reactor cathode wire, it is possible to introduce an anode facing from which starts a voltage relative to the cathode while fed to its heads under less tension, the loading is no longer created by the gas pressure but by the inter-electrode voltage across the void of ionized hydrogen (or the voltage of the electrolytic cell), an RC circuit would extract electrical energy, by means of the download autopulsante in scheme resistance negative (see below), from the source of excess claimed abnormal, be it of Zero Point or LENR (even, possibly, as reported in some papers, from the thermal energy content of the external environment).

Theories In the literature, a very diverse aspects and implications of the different approaches have been addressed, both in experimental and theoretical.

At the moment, our commitment is not intended to discriminate the validity of competing theories. On the contrary, we consider all the interesting working hypotheses that are internally consistent, to help in the search of the interrelationships between parameters governing the phenomena.

Solicitations The strain appears to be more effective as a preventive measure, the electric force that directly participates in the charged particles (protons or electrons) within the appropriate paths by making them “buy” the necessary energy and local concentrations under the action of the electric field.

It is, as repeatedly stressed during our presentations, to act both on the field of loading (or deloading, more promising because it does not directly limited by processes in the effect of saturation) and on the migration of the charges through the latex.

The stress then is the administration of periodic pulses of high peak, extremely steep, and very high load-bearing, powers for durations so low as to cause only small energy input to the system.

The techniques implemented using the latest state of the art equipment in the field of production and impulse control, and of K. Shoulders EV (Strong electron), show bundles consisting of an incredibly high number of energetic electrons.

Structures The adoption of nanostructures is presented as a must for the emergence of behaviors that have been predicted theoretically by several authors (B. Ahern, etc.) relating to far-from-equilibrium conditions and the consequent possibility of localization of energy above threshold levels for the activation of nuclear reactions.

It must not necessarily consist of nano powders, but preferably micro-structure surface nano-powders, in combination with ceramic powders to avoid sintering.

Of fundamental importance is also the presence of alkali or alkaline-earth elements as electron donors.

Systems with two/three active components may raise the synergistic effect. For example, combining metals with significant difference between the Fermi levels, or using piezoelectric or pyro powders, which enhance the effects of the localizations of temperature or of electrical impulses.

Important as well is the experimentation on the stresses in metal colloids. We therefore realized electrodes of metalloceramici to nanoscale structure, and a more easily handled powder.

Reactors Were designed (and is currently under construction), three different reactors, based on cathodes in electrolytic mixture of powders:

a radial configuration, serial and serial Shoulders; two pulse – integrated reactors (which perform both the function of on-site production of the discharge, that the use of ) high voltage, one electrolyte, the other for operation in vacuum; a vacuum tube for replication and enhancement of the experiments of P. Correa, using nano-structured cathodes also metalloceramici.

Extraction of electricity And ‘ all clear how simple heat production (medium or high temperature) is in itself already a high goal, if achieved by processes that do not require non-renewable fuel, do not produce CO2, do not pollute, and the next step, the transformation of thermal energy into electricity, in addition to requiring high temperatures and a cycle of transformation with machines in motion, always presents low yields.

Thus the need for a direct production of electric energy from processes with unclaimed Overunity is much felt by justify a significant research effort.

The experiments for the extraction of current of P. Correa with Glow Discharges in vacuum tubes, those of A. Chernetsky with Spark Gaps of J.L. Naudin and our plasma electrolytic, have in common at least a fundamental point: the existence of a part of the diagram IV with negative slope, the so-called negative resistance zone, in which a voltage increase corresponds to a decrease of current.

According to the theories, processes are assumed periodic spontaneous reorganization of the plasma, negative entropy, the so-called negentropy.

From the sustained spontaneous oscillations that arise exerting the plasma in these conditions, it is possible to extract energy directly as electricity through an RC circuit consistently sized to agree with the frequencies of pulsation of the plasma.

For example, here is a picture from the site of J. L. Naudin: http://jlnlabs.online.fr/cfr/ape/apenrg.htm From the labs of J. L. Naudin

In accordance with what is stated, we are determining the values of the optimum parameters for our configurations and for the corresponding operating ranges.

Conclusions Whether it’s energy or Zero Point of anomalous excess energy, the complex plasma – circuit can extract the energy available and ennobles the form electricity.

It remains to be seen whether, and how much, electricity has pulled from Overunity, but it is certainly a crucial first step towards the efficient production of electricity, a method which deserves to be given an adequate trial.

In addition, the direct provision of electricity brings us closer to the day when we will have self-reliance of equipment, allowing machines to generate enough power to power themselves. –Ugo Abundo Open Power Association

Hugo Abndo was the Italian high school teacher who worked with his kids to replicate a cold fusion reactor called the Athanor.

Cold Fusion: new site for the project Hydrobetatron
http://www.greenstyle.it/fusione-fredda-abundo-lancia-il-nuovo-sito-del-progetto-hydrobetatron-43556.html

Interview with Ugo Abundo
http://www.greenstyle.it/athanor-la-fusione-fredda-open-source-intervista-a-ugo-abundo-10388.html

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex- href=”mailto:l@eskimo.com”>l@eskimo.com/msg86539.html

Translation of Interview with Hugo Abundo

Athanor, cold fusion Open Source: Interview with Ugo Abundo
102
9
28

Finding a viable alternative to fossil fuels, perhaps less dangerous than traditional nuclear, is one of the major objectives of our technological era. From renewable sources to nuclear power generation (who knows how safe, then), there are so many attempts made these days to finally send in the attic oil and coal. Among them, stand out research on LENR, nuclear reactions at low temperature, usually defined with the popular expression of cold fusion .

From that Andrea Rossi and Sergio Focardi have presented their E-Cat , the number of reactors and studio projects has ballooned. Among those competitors to Rossi, the project stands out in our Athanor , developed as a school project in a high school in Rome. To understand more, we decided to ask some questions to the Project Manager, prof. Ugo Abundo.

We begin with an introductory question. What is the project Athanor and what are its aims?

Athanor (alpha-thanatos) is the ancient alchemical furnace in the name, denial of death, contains the meaning of perpetual renewal, renew themselves through transformation, so that it can well be taken as a model of a device for extracting energy infinite by a reaction.

The project is in the field LENR (low energy nuclear reactions), improperly called “Cold Fusion” in common parlance, is to examine the conditions in which, in the presence of catalysts, are obtained from excess heat energy input, by reacting light elements which interact with nuclei, moving items to atomic numbers greater.

The aim of the experiment is the search for the best reaction conditions, in view of the development of reactors for the industrial production of energy, which highlights the characters of inexhaustible, no emission of carbon dioxide, lack of radioactive waste, availability for all, regardless of the wealth of mineral resources.

Next goal, but not secondary, is to protect brevettualmente results without the passing proprietary rights (by act only licensed) to not allow that buyers can possibly deprive humanity of employment opportunities.

In parallel, research and implanted in an “Open Source”, promptly making the results public on the Web, and creating a group, open to all experts and stakeholders, to share problems, proposals, checks.

athanor
athanor
More photos

Let us dwell on the technical details. What happens in your reactor? What are the substances that react and how much energy is produced?

The reactions involved are not yet known and are themselves the object of experimentation. In an electrolyte solution of potassium carbonate are immersed two electrodes, tungsten and stainless steel, between which a voltage is maintained interelectrode 150 -200 Volt. It forms a plasma that heats the solution by evaporating the water from the steam will recover thermal energy emitted, under suitable conditions, the catalyst and the electrolyte are degraded to a lesser extent, and the only real fuel is hydrogen from water. We measured yields higher than 400% between thermal energy outgoing and incoming power, At this point we need a wide network of independent replications to validate our results, in this respect, are already in progress for five field trials to conduct external, and others will follow exponentially.

What has most surprised of the project Athanor is perhaps the place where he took life: a high school in Rome, the IIS Pirelli. Therefore, induce more reactions LENR is easier than you think?

Far from it. First, our results are being carefully examined by the scientific community and acclaimed by independent researchers to replicate the experiment and validate eventually yields. Then we must not underestimate how difficult it can also deal with issues such as LENR when you have two powerful tools that are often prevalent in the school: the scientific modesty and the absence of a priori foreclosures, which never miss one of the great scientists, too often instead may lacking when you have expertise not associated with wide horizons.

During the school year, how was your relationship with your students? In that way they could interact with the search?

They interacted in the best way: they have been made aware of the assumptions, objectives and methods planned in a schematic way; were proactive, active, curious, participated in the refinement of the programming, the critical discussion of partial results, the construction and to test the equipment, the conduct of the measures, the collection and organization of multimedia documentation, implementation of communication and have materially held the conference audience: an experience all round. And above all, they learned that the school not only offers certainty about the areas of proven validity, but also tools for the construction of their own ability to free criticism in cases still debated.

When it comes to cold fusion, the key word in the last year and a half has been E-Cat. What have your work to that of the engineer Andrea Rossi? The two reactors, according to her, are similar in theory? And as for the technical potential?

There are similarities and differences.

The main similarity is given by the use of ‘hydrogen, in the E-Cat in gaseous form, in our device (which follows the trials of Mizuno) in the form electrolytic metals catalysts.

The main difference highlights how, in our device, the particles are cooled by the solution that evaporates, and sinterizzino less, continuing to offer large surface area to the reaction.

The potential applications are both incredibly high.

According to what may be his knowledge in the field, believes that the promises of companies like Leonardo Corporation or as the Defkalion will be respected? In short, according to her in 2013 we will have the “boiler” cold fusion on the market?

I hope so strongly, but unfortunately I see that there are problems of non-clear (but certainly not technical) that hinder the take-off, perhaps attributable to push “brake” outside the group of experimenters.

If we understand correctly, your reactor should already be patented. We read of your intention to disclose the technical specifications of your invention, so as to enable any industry professional, with a fully equipped laboratory, to replicate your test. Can you confirm this intention and tell us if it is already possible to examine this data?

Of course, what was promised was immediately turned into facts.

On the Network are available construction drawings, suggestions for replication (we are helping ourselves five groups external to build “clones” of our reactor), the results of our tests, shared protocols developed with the collaboration of the investigators who have joined the challenge posed by the Open Source mode. A site that is following the beginning in a particularly timely disclosure of the action is “22Passi” moderated by Dott.Daniele Passerini, obviously together with many others, in the world, on particular aspects.

Soon it will be operating the official website of the trial Athanor, which provides for absolute freedom of content acquisition and republishing.

Have you already got external collaborations thanks to this “openness”?

The aforementioned collaborations that are already operational are actually fast you are put on our side and already compete with us in terms of enthusiasm and proactive action. I am sure that the improvements in the trial will come just from the dialogue with these groups with great sense of experimentation supported by powerful capacity ‘technical and design.

In short, we are in good company, so as to make us think that maybe we deserve.

In what way do you think cold fusion may help in protecting the environment?

Mainly just providing clean energy, inexhaustible, economic.

How long before your expected reactor - or a product inspired by it - will be ready for industrial production?

We do not know to what extent our results, potentially spoiled by not great level of the experimental facilities of the school lab, will be reappointed. But if they were, attention to the movement of air! We have logistical resources (the Foundation J. Von Neumann) to unleash a real pandemonium on the Net (organized) aimed at conducting an experiment deployed, the speed never previously conceivable.

Always in the positive case, we estimate two years to the first applications.

In recent months, the research on nuclear power is experiencing a very special time. There is widespread talk of revolutionary discoveries and laws of physics that have to be revised. Yet, an important part of the scientific community looks with skeptical eyes both LENR, both the piezonucleare . They are the natural limits of the academic system or in some way, according to her, a little ‘healthy skepticism may help distinguish the true from the many innovations hoaxes?

Buffaloes there are not ever in the research, if anything, “cowboys”. Experimentation is always, in essence, a serious operation. It is then up to the caution of the individual exposed in a better and more open modes of conduction, to give the opportunity for independent researchers to assess the degree of correctness of the results. But it is assured, the world moves more with someone who is claiming victory too soon, and with those who sing without defeat (conveniently) never even fight (we speak of the challenge of human curiosity and knowability of nature).

Skepticism is perfectly acceptable and necessary in science: it is the burden of proof to the innovator. But the judges must be calm and wide horizons. However, on balance, no one’s ever seen a great idea, if it is really great, it is possible to stop. Or, it was not great, enthusiastic or a priori that both opponents.

And do not worry about the laws of physics: they are waiting impatiently to be thorough, integrated, best interpreted. I do not think it is necessary in this case flip them, just stop talking just us and be willing to listen to what they want to say.

Okay. We thank you for the kindness and courtesy shown.

With the opportunity of expression, a cordial greeting to you and your readers, by all the project team that is in tune with Athanor as disclosed herein.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.