Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Adware vendors buy Chrome Extensions to send ad- and malware-filled updates
ars technica website | Jan 17 2014, 3:10pm -0800 | Ron Amadeo

Posted on 01/20/2014 9:57:14 AM PST by Utilizer

...ownership of a Chrome extension can be transferred to another party, and the new owners can issue an ad-filled update over Chrome's update service, which sends the adware out to every user of that extension.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: chrome; extensions; malware
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Utilizer

And this, my friends, is why I tell everyone “NOT” to download “Chrome”.

It doesn’t affect download speeds in any way that a user would notice and if they do notice they have never the less down loaded “Corporate Malware”.

I

C

U


21 posted on 01/20/2014 11:37:29 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

I disagree, but I don’t have 100 extensions like many others either. I did use Firefox but that memory hole that used up CPU’s never got fixed and Chrome is much faster since I started using it last year.


22 posted on 01/20/2014 11:52:41 AM PST by packrat35 (Pelosi is only on loan to the world from Satan. Hopefully he will soon want his baby killer back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer

Chrome sucks because you cannot turn off the automatic updates.


23 posted on 01/20/2014 11:56:19 AM PST by a fool in paradise ("Health care is too important to be left to the government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698)

I use Chrome (as well as IE). I’m a web developer.

With Chrome I use 3 extensions, AdBlock (it would be ironic if they sell to an adware group), Web Developer, and ColorZilla (for picking color ids).


24 posted on 01/20/2014 11:56:22 AM PST by bahits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

Is it demosntrably faster than using a regular brower would be the question and I would argue “Not to the human experience”.

M2M, yeah.


25 posted on 01/20/2014 12:11:20 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer

Thanks for your reply. I’ll keep on reading up on tablet security.


26 posted on 01/20/2014 12:17:17 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

The dam thing is couched with the repeated Flash updates, so a user needs to slow down on this install, otherwise Chrome gets quietly installed.


27 posted on 01/20/2014 2:06:34 PM PST by SgtHooper (If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Since firefox was nuking my whole computer and dragging everything down to a crawl, I’d say yeah it is much faster. The browser may not be so much faster but my computer certainly is now.


28 posted on 01/20/2014 2:40:02 PM PST by packrat35 (Pelosi is only on loan to the world from Satan. Hopefully he will soon want his baby killer back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

Oh your computer is faster now.

No problem.

Seen that a lot.

What anti virus were you running when you made. the change and then noticed?

I have found AVG to compete horribly with web browsers and certain extensions.


29 posted on 01/20/2014 8:27:07 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

The problem was not anti virus but Firefox using 80% of my CPU


30 posted on 01/20/2014 10:36:43 PM PST by packrat35 (Pelosi is only on loan to the world from Satan. Hopefully he will soon want his baby killer back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana; Utilizer

Actually, Firefox may be at risk. Extensions, by their very nature, use Chrome as an executable mechanism. If you ever go to configure one of your extension in Firefox, for instance, you may notice the URL line starts with chrome:\\

Better safe than sorry.


31 posted on 01/21/2014 4:45:05 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

Thanks for the tip. I use AdBlocker and Ghostery primarily, with only an occasional video downloader extension on FireFox but I should probably take a closer look at the last one and of course any newer ones to make certain this problem does no crop up in the future.


32 posted on 01/21/2014 9:50:21 AM PST by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the mooslimbs trying to kill them-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; Dr. Sivana

Being primarily a Firefox user, I am aware of several extensions, add-ons that were found to infect your computer with adware, malware. It’s not neccesssarily a Chromr issue.


33 posted on 01/21/2014 11:58:11 AM PST by lbryce (Obama:The Worst is Yet To Come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson