And they say that overcoming the Coulomb barrier does not, under any circumstances we understand, happen at low energies.
***Yet another straw argument. When 2 atoms fuse together, their energy release is not “low energy”, it is simply so diffused into the metal matrix that their energy is absorbed into the matrix and they generate heat. The difference between LENR and hot-fusion physics is that LENR takes place in a condensed matrix whereas the hot fusion stuff takes place in a plasma. Would you rather try to insert a poker into the ass of a crow when it’s flying around or would you rather do it when it is caged? That’s the difference. The energy level of insertion and resulting phonal output are the same whether he’s in a cage or flying around. So, like the crow, you can stick it up...
Now you're arguing that LENR doesn't actually happen at low energy. Geez, get a clue. Let me explain your own fraudulent theory to you: In order for charged nucleons to get close enough to release the binding energy of the strong nuclear force, they must be pushed together somehow, because the electromagnetic force to which they're also subjected is LONG RANGE. Overcoming the Coulomb barrier at low energies doesn't refer to the output binding energy, which is the same no matter how the nucleons get together. It refers to the energy required to push them through the electromagnetic repulsion.
And to answer an earlier statement: I, for one, don't believe you do have an EE degree. I don't think you've ever even taken a class in basic science, mathematics or engineering, let alone passed one. And the fact that you don't understand why it's called LENR is yet more evidence of that ignorance.