As for sticking to scientific arguments, If I remove invective and blather from your current response, this is what remains:
Rossi was convicted of Tax evasion, not fraud.
OK. This is fact, not opinion.
Unfortunately, it's not true. He was convicted of both. http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/docs/1996Corriere-della-Sera-Rossi-March28.pdfYou may object to the source, but this is simply a reprint of his sentencing transcript. He perpetrated a fraud on a municipality claiming to have a new and innovative waste disposal system, which he did not have. He was ordered to pay restitution and was sentenced to 2 years and 8 months.
The rest of your post is name calling, with no content whatsoever. The qualification "hot fusion" is unnecessary. There is no other kind of fusion. As for my buddies, I was a condensed matter theorist, and except for bumping up against one or two of them accidentally at a crowded APS after-hours social event, I wouldn't know a fusion physicist if he dropped dead on my doorstep. There was no fusion research going on at my university, then or now. I defend them because they're doing real science, and I upbraid your "scientists" because they aren't. Nothing personal.
As for sticking to scientific arguments, If I remove invective and blather from your current response, this is what remains:
***That doesn’t address the fact that YOUR arguments lack scientific validity. Turning it around to me is a bunch of bowlsheet when we examine how many scientific questions I have put to you that you have blithely ignored. How about that there 14000 replications, Mr. Sucked-on-guvmint-Teat?
As for sticking to scientific arguments, If I remove invective and blather from your current response, this is what remains:
***That doesn’t address the fact that YOUR arguments lack scientific validity. Turning it around to me is a bunch of bowlsheet when we examine how many scientific questions I have put to you that you have blithely ignored. How about that there 14000 replications, Mr. Sucked-on-guvmint-Teat?
OK. This is fact, not opinion.
***There you go again. If you post it, it’s fact. If someone else posts it, it’s opinion. Of course, we’re expected to overlook the fact that you’re pulling from a virulently anti-Rossi source, and that this isn’t even a Rossi thread. YET AGAIN.
my research and graduate education was paid back in spades, many years ago. ....I upbraid your “scientists” because they aren’t. Nothing personal.
***Nothing personal, but until you stop posting freshman level fallacies, you have not even STARTED to pay back your guvmint teat salary.