Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too

No, it wasn’t. Since it wasn’t called a fumble who recovered it can’t be reviewed because officially there was no recovery. Lame, they should change that.


328 posted on 01/19/2014 6:59:48 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]


To: Impy

Would have sucked...had that call determined the game.


330 posted on 01/19/2014 7:01:07 PM PST by RckyRaCoCo (Shall Not Be Infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

To: Impy
I thought it was called a fumble. What was not reviewable was a fumble not recovered in the end zone. Fumbles in the end zone when a score is involved is reviewable, they said, but no other fumble is reviewable. The call on the field stands.

The announcers were stunned that nobody saw the clean recovery by SF.

-PJ

332 posted on 01/19/2014 7:01:48 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

To: GOPsterinMA

How’s Khent? In need of meth?


337 posted on 01/19/2014 7:05:59 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson