Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Princess Madeleine to Deliver Baby in the US
The Local ^ | 11 Jan 2014

Posted on 01/13/2014 4:25:24 PM PST by nickcarraway

Princess Madeleine and her husband Christopher O'Neil have decided that their child will be born in the US, the Swedish Royal Court has announced.

Madeleine reveals royal baby's gender: report (30 Oct 13) Pregnant Princess to attend Nobel alone (19 Oct 13) Royal baby on the way for Swedish princess (03 Sep 13)

"After careful consideration and in consultation with the King and Queen, Princess Madeleine and Mr. Christopher O'Neill have decided that their child will be born in New York," Svante Lindqvist at the Royal Court wrote in a statement.

The baby, set to become fifth in line to the Swedish throne, is expected to arrive at the end of February 2014.

Writer and royal expert Roger Lundgren has explained Madeleine's decision to give birth in New York as a purely practical decision.

"She has had a tough pregnancy, she missed the Nobel banquette for example, and it is simply more convenient to give birth there than in Sweden," he said.

"But many here at home will probably be disappointed, they want their princess back home in Sweden, as part of the royal family. The fact that Madeleine will give birth abroad cements a distance to her."

Lundgren explained that the decision carries no constitutional consequences.

"It has no constitutional significance where she gives birth, as the King and Queen have given their approval."

"Today we live in a global world, we live around the world and experience new things. This will be an international child which will get the best of different worlds," Lundgren told the TT news agency.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: anchorbaby; baby; deliver; immigration; madeleine; newyork; princess; princessmadeleine; royals; sweden; swedish
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
Swedish royalty anchor baby?
1 posted on 01/13/2014 4:25:25 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Ages of socialized medicine in Sweden have likely resulted in sub par hospitals.


2 posted on 01/13/2014 4:26:48 PM PST by drbuzzard (All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annalex; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows

Royalist PING!


3 posted on 01/13/2014 4:26:54 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

If only ALL the anchor babies were Swedish...


4 posted on 01/13/2014 4:29:52 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"Swedish royalty anchor baby? "Weird. Why not in Cuba? Zimbabwe? Zurich?
5 posted on 01/13/2014 4:30:08 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Swedish royalty anchor baby?

We need more of those.

6 posted on 01/13/2014 4:30:10 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
it is simply more convenient to give birth there than in Sweden

BS!!

A high-risked delivery is more likely to result in a successful outcome for mother and child in the US. For now - BOcare will being us down to the 3rd world level!

7 posted on 01/13/2014 4:30:20 PM PST by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Obama, is that you?


8 posted on 01/13/2014 4:30:54 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

You want to live in socialist hellhole?


9 posted on 01/13/2014 4:31:29 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Why can’t she have DHL deliver it?


10 posted on 01/13/2014 4:32:30 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I don’t know where you are living at the moment, but Sweden looks rather attractive right now.


11 posted on 01/13/2014 4:32:43 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"She has had a tough pregnancy, she missed the Nobel banquette for example, and it is simply more convenient to give birth there than in Sweden," he said.

I guess they are coming to the US to take advantage of America’s subpar health system (according to the Liberals in this country and abroad).

Well the US has the best hospitals in the world but these royals should not get used to coming here for excellent medicine because the Democrats are hard at work bringing the US down to their level.

12 posted on 01/13/2014 4:33:58 PM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Kenya?


13 posted on 01/13/2014 4:34:45 PM PST by NonValueAdded (It's not the penalty, it's the lack of coverage on 1 Jan. Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; a fool in paradise

Is John Roberts trying to adopt another one ahead of forthcoming Obamacare challenges?


14 posted on 01/13/2014 4:34:55 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drbuzzard
Exactly! Why not have your royal bebe in your own country, delivered by your own SOCIALIST HEALTHCARE docs?

Her hubby is Brit...why not deliver there?

15 posted on 01/13/2014 4:36:44 PM PST by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

They have a name for people like you. Muslim-coddling socialists.


16 posted on 01/13/2014 4:37:54 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hedging their bets for the 2056 US presidential election.


17 posted on 01/13/2014 4:39:19 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

if you believe those that say 0bama was/is eligible under A2S1, then their child could be eligible to become POTUS.

at that point, a Queen of a foreign country could also be POTUS... which is EXACTLY the situation the founders were looking to avoid by inserting the phrase ‘natural born citizen’ into the Constitution

this is just another example why 0bama supporters and anti-birthers are full of sh*t


18 posted on 01/13/2014 4:40:04 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Wow. Just wow. Have you looked around our own country, recently? What would some addled Swede call you?
19 posted on 01/13/2014 4:41:51 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Lotsa Swedes have moved to Norway.


20 posted on 01/13/2014 4:44:21 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson