To: Jack Hydrazine
One of the things that has gone down the memory hole is that Marx was also a failed mathematician. He wrote an absolutely hilarious proof that a sequence of continuous functions must converge to a continuous limit function [it does not.]
His proof involves appeals to "forces of nature," which even by the standards of the early nineteenth century were not considered rigorous. So he decided to become a "philosopher" instead. From time-to-time Russian and the occasional Chinese mathematician tried to argue that he was "essentially correct." Eventually they decided it was probably better not to talk about his mathematical career at all.
2 posted on
01/11/2014 8:59:17 PM PST by
FredZarguna
(Das is nicht richtig nur falsch. Das ist nicht einmal falsch.)
To: FredZarguna
4 posted on
01/11/2014 9:03:15 PM PST by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; me = independent conservative)
To: FredZarguna; Jack Hydrazine
One of the things that has gone down the memory hole is that Marx was also a failed mathematician. He wrote an absolutely hilarious proof that a sequence of continuous functions must converge to a continuous limit function [it does not.] His proof involves appeals to "forces of nature," which even by the standards of the early nineteenth century were not considered rigorous. So he decided to become a "philosopher" instead. From time-to-time Russian and the occasional Chinese mathematician tried to argue that he was "essentially correct." Eventually they decided it was probably better not to talk about his mathematical career at all.Thanks, I did not know this!
5 posted on
01/11/2014 9:04:52 PM PST by
thecodont
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson