Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

Children have the same right to be supported by both parents. There are no distinctions because from the point of view of the child, he/she is not the one responsible for existing.

Segregating children by something that is beyond their responsibility is how we get to the point of some children being deemed having a right to live and some not.

We’re back full circle to making the child pay the price for the one or both parents abdicating personal responsibility.

Apparently, that is still all that matters (that adults get the option to abdicate responsibility). This is exactly how we arrived at the culture of abortion in the first place.


77 posted on 01/09/2014 11:36:46 AM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne
Children have the same right to be supported by both parents. There are no distinctions because from the point of view of the child, he/she is not the one responsible for existing. Segregating children by something that is beyond their responsibility is how we get to the point of some children being deemed having a right to live and some not.

My point is that, by removing downsides to having kids out of wedlock (ie, the girl could get the guy to pay child support with or without marriage), it directly and predictably led to a large increase in out-of-wedlock births.

81 posted on 01/09/2014 3:50:28 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson