Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne
Children have the same right to be supported by both parents. There are no distinctions because from the point of view of the child, he/she is not the one responsible for existing. Segregating children by something that is beyond their responsibility is how we get to the point of some children being deemed having a right to live and some not.

My point is that, by removing downsides to having kids out of wedlock (ie, the girl could get the guy to pay child support with or without marriage), it directly and predictably led to a large increase in out-of-wedlock births.

81 posted on 01/09/2014 3:50:28 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

That may be true, but the alternatives are abortion (which punishes the child) or children living in poverty (which punishes the child).

No matter which way you look at it, when one or both parents abdicate responsibility, children pay the price. They always have

Abortion is a just a more modern, convenient way to get the same result ... get out of responsibility. Because it is so convenient more children pay the price with this method.

The very LEAST we can do is not contribute to the problem by condoning the shifting around of responsibility.

It is extremely clear who is responsible for a child coming into existence and for its welfare: the two people who created him/her. We should insist that these facts be stated clearly and without any equivocation whatsoever.


82 posted on 01/09/2014 4:37:01 PM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson