Actually, yes, yes you can.
Naaah !
I was given to understand that people that had, as young kids, taken ADHD medicine, or veterans that had counseling possibly related to PTSD might be disqualified. Is that wrong?
HF
Sure they do.............if the government has them. When government no longer fears the people there's tyranny. Walsh should know that.
He is correct that no one needs to own an AK-47. So by that logic, let’s ban all minivans—no one needs one of those; 2 sedans work just fine. Let’s ban all recumbent bicycles—who rides those anymore, anyways? Let’s ban all houses with more than 5 bedrooms and 3 1/2 baths—no one has large families anymore, right, so no one needs a big house. Oh, and we should also ban mechanical pencils—use a good ole number 2, people!
When you put it in those terms, the argument suddenly loses all its force, doesn’t it?
They delight in sending me these large beautiful four color packages of information on their organization.
I take even greater delight in throwing them away. I would tell them the are completely wasting their time, but hell, I didn't ask for the stupid package in the first place. Besides, since they see no reason for the 2nd amendment to exist, I see no reason for them to exist.
Lawbreakers are gonna break the law. Meanwhile this administration illegally ran guns to narcoterrorists in Mexico, guns which have been traced to thousands of murders including US officials. The administration has lied and stalled investigations into these crimes.
If he was really against gun violence he would be putting pressure and public attention on this administration.
And I don’t need some arrogant little ass telling me what kind of gun I should be able to have. SCREW YOU, JOHNNY.
Who in their right mind listens to anything the AARP say’s????
Actually, yes, yes you can.
Walsh goes typically by the leftist playbook numbers:
(1) Announces that he, too is a gun-owner, in which the pro-gun reader is supposed to breathe a sigh of relief and be inclined to get on board.
Sets up the old assault-weapon/hunting strawman. Hey John. During the course of how many recent shootings, how many times did the killer had an actual AK-47 or similar weapon? What percentage of the killers AMW has profiled killed with an AK-47? FAIL.
If he can tell me nobody needs to own an AK-47 then does that give me the right to tell all those left lane campers that nobody needs to own a frickin Prius?
This statement is just a straight up bold faced lie. Either that or he is just a gun ignorant moron speaking about a subject that he knows nothing about. Take your pick.
From AARP? Give me a break, the dude is addle brained if he belngs to that organization
“But nobody needs to own an AK-47”
Hey John, it’s called the “Bill of Rights” not the bill of needs. No one needs a Ferrari either but they’re not outlawed
Another blathering, blubbering Libtard doin’ the Gun Grabber Jive.
John Walsh is rich, famous and “connected” both politically and in Hollywood. He has not lived in the real world for decades. He is a
typical liberal idiot who simply cannot understand the difference between
rights and privileges. His opinion and a buck “might” get you a cup of
coffee in a shi*ty restaurant.
aarp? Won’t read it.
Actually, John, I do need to own an AK-47. So suck it, you worthless kapo.
” But nobody needs to own an AK-47.”
Nobody needs to criticize people who want to own an AK-47
The second amendment mentions nothing about hunting. Nothing.