Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sans-Culotte

A lot of people agreed that Royal Flash was the weakest of the series. The movie had a stupendous cast, and Fraser had done a very successful screenplay of The Three Musketeers, though The Four Musketeers was less successful.

For most of the audience, there was just no familiarity with either the characters or the history. Making matters worse, the timing was of an action comedy, which is a half-tone off from a historical character comedy.

Their best bet would have been to start from the start with Flashman. Even though it would have stretched into two movies, or even a miniseries, if it were done today, the background of historical Afghanistan would resonate. It would need a masterful screenwriter, however.


10 posted on 01/06/2014 5:26:37 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (There Is Still A Very Hot War On Terror, Just Not On The MSM. Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
I think they may have chosen Royal Flash to film because it was one of the few novels that didn't involve massive troop movements and battles. They probably thought it would resonate with Americans who would not be familiar with Queen Victoria's "Little Wars".

In any case, the film was well done, with a great cast and director. I loved the Musketeer films as well.

11 posted on 01/06/2014 10:19:39 AM PST by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson