How can anyone say that another’s argument is ‘accurate’ but misleading? This is a direct quote from the actual interview. Not taken out of context. The whole thing is a cut and paste.
I did read the part about the comparison group. What comparison group? Are we talk about other vaccines? The placebo? No details at all to that statement.
“This is a direct quote from the actual interview. Not taken out of context. The whole thing is a cut and paste.”
What is a direct quote? What interview? What is “cut and paste?” I have no idea what you are talking about here.
“How can anyone say that another’s argument is ‘accurate’ but misleading?”
This is the whole point of the Snopes article, or at least half the article....it is not enough to know that someone suffered from a health problem following a vaccine, you need to determine if the health problem was caused by the vaccine. After all, if you look at any large group of people for any reasonable length of time, some of those people are going to have health problems.
“I did read the part about the comparison group. What comparison group? Are we talk about other vaccines? The placebo? No details at all to that statement.”
Did you follow the link that Snopes gave? They are pretty good about things like that. Here it is again...
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Vaccines/HPV/Index.html
And here you will find....
“Adverse events in the HPV vaccinated population were compared to another appropriate population (such as adolescents vaccinated with vaccines other than HPV)...”