Nachum, is this of relevance to your collection?
From American Thinker:
“President Obama’s personal data is “not in particular government data bases” so his identity cannot be verified. And this according to White House sources. Huh? What kind of data? And what kind of president cannot have his identity verified. And this little disclosure comes just as Americans are turning off the news to an extent that makes the classic “Friday afternoon data dump” look like publicity-seeking.”
**SNIP**
I did collect the raw news story about his failure to use the website. Also, there were pieces about the inability to use or prove a valid SS#. This also connects to another story about Orly Taitz feeling vindicated over this inability to prove his identity.
So, the American Thinker's piece is a nice compilation, but not really new. The White House is now saying that the president's personal information was scrubbed from the web intentionally as a security precaution.
So, to summerize: He has no proof of a SS#. He had none prior to coming to office. He has no legal proof of birth and the courts have protected any investigation into who he is from the public eye in cases at virtually every judicial level including the supreme court.
We have some proofs that he has committed a vast amount of identity fraud, but there is no way to make him pay for his crime. No court will convict him. He owns the DOJ. He apparently owns the DHS, FBI, IRS and the CIA. He systematically employs large groups of thugs to enforce his point of view and policy.
For all we know, he was installed by the CIA and other clandestine groups to do the very things he is doing to our country. We know a great deal, but have no recourse.
So, yes it is relevant, but not really new. Sort of redundant.