Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Controversial? More like the Truth; that's why this family is so popular.


1 posted on 12/18/2013 5:56:33 AM PST by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: PROCON

Too damn bad. Free country get over it leftists.


39 posted on 12/18/2013 6:25:50 AM PST by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

I wondered when one of the Robertsons would be asked about homosexuality. I wouldn’t be surprised if this spelled the beginning of the end for their celebrity. It’s thought crime to do anything but celebrate homosexuality; mere tolerance is not sufficient anymore.


42 posted on 12/18/2013 6:26:43 AM PST by opus86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

That’s NOT controversial!


44 posted on 12/18/2013 6:27:17 AM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

We’re losing the battle if his views, which i consider pretty normal, are considered “controversial”.


47 posted on 12/18/2013 6:28:00 AM PST by Travis T. OJustice (I miss you, dad. :()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

At the link you provided, there is another link to the GQ story. It’s three pages, and really worth it. The writer is a foul-mouthed dweeb, but Phil really impresses him.


52 posted on 12/18/2013 6:33:55 AM PST by Albion Wilde ("Remember... the first revolutionary was Satan."--Russian Orthodox Archpriest Dmitry Smirnov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

You can be sure now that the media will blow this up out of proportion and make it headline news.

The left hates this family and has been waiting for them to slip and violate a rule of PC. Then they would pounce.

I hope this family tells them to go to hell.


54 posted on 12/18/2013 6:36:42 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Phil Robertson speaks for me!


57 posted on 12/18/2013 6:40:59 AM PST by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Hard to see what the controversy would be about that.


61 posted on 12/18/2013 6:52:40 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

It’s not like the libs are watching their show or buying their products. Why should they are.


63 posted on 12/18/2013 7:01:43 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON
Phil Robertson (Duck Dynasty) makes controversial true comments about homosexuality (FIXED)
64 posted on 12/18/2013 7:01:45 AM PST by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Disagree with queers, agree with G-d Almighty; and that makes you CONTROVERSIAL?? To quote Mr. Traficant; “Beam me up!”


70 posted on 12/18/2013 7:04:02 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

So, saying “men and women are designed to have sex rather than men and men” is now ‘controversial’.

Sigh.


71 posted on 12/18/2013 7:04:20 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

I’m still searching for the “controversial” part of Phil’s statement. Can’t find it.


72 posted on 12/18/2013 7:04:46 AM PST by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON; Admin Moderator

Question.

Did you post the GQ headline and an excerpt from the GQ article and yet use the Fox News link?

And why?

Are you looking to get this thread pulled? Hopefully the moderator will fix this and not pull it.


75 posted on 12/18/2013 7:14:46 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON
What Phil did was take the discussion in a direction that it entirely logical and correct but generally is avoided especially by those who promote homo acceptance… basically, he moved it away from the usual crap of softer open-to-interpretations concepts such as love and commitment and moved it straight to a discussion about sex. Nothing wrong with that and frankly, it is the only way to win this battle… the definition of marriage doesn’t deal with vague concepts.

The most hilarious part of this article is the comments from the GLAAD rep " Phil and his family claim to be Christian, but Phil's lies about an entire community fly in the face of what true Christians believe….." said GLAAD rep Wilson Cruz. Something tells me that the group specifically mentioned in the Bible as “not inheriting the kingdom of God” is not where I would normally go to find out what is true Christianity and what is not. 1 Corinthians 6:9

80 posted on 12/18/2013 7:22:30 AM PST by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

He’s lost the gay duck call buyers for sure.


81 posted on 12/18/2013 7:22:38 AM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

What’s “controversial” about that???

Now THIS should be controversial but isn’t.

I have said for years — to friends and more than a few radio audiences — that the homosexual community wants the legal right to perform in public acts for which a heterosexual couple would — and should — be arrested for indecency.  If you’ve ever seen the images of how the queers in Frisco and New Orleans behave during their periodic “celebrations” of their “deathstyle,” it has already happened there.   The next two years will give the Nancy Pelosi crowd a chance to federalize their deathstyle.
 
I really don’t care HOW they got to where they are — recruited or via genetic predisposition — in their genitalia worship (and that’s what it is), I just don’t want them demonstrating their explicit sexual behavior in front of our kids and grandkids.  ADULT homosexuals have the same right as the rest of us to do nearly whatever they wish IN THE BEDROOM, where it belongs.
 
Why do I call it a “deathstyle?”  For over 20 years, my wife was a member of a well-known ladies chorus.  One of their first directors was a gifted musician who also happened to be openly homosexual.  He died a slow, agonizing death — at age 43 — of AIDS.  How “gay” could THAT be? Most homosexuals — many of whom have as many as several hundred unprotected encounters a year — ARE dead at an early age of HIV infections which explains why there are so few OLD homosexuals. And even that “protection” ain’t. With even the condom manufacturers admitting to a 20% failure rate, it’s akin to playing Russian roulette with your willie.

Bill Clinton’s CDC released figures a few years ago reflecting that fully 85% of all AIDS/HIV cases are
1. Active, non-monogamous homosexuals, (the largest subset)
2. Heterosexuals and bisexuals who have had sex with group 1 and
3. IV drug abusers who share needles.
(Kinda gives new meaning to Romans 6:23, doesn’t it?)
The remaining 15% are those who have contracted AIDS via other, non-sexual/non-drug means SUCH AS TRANSFUSIONS OF TAINTED BLOOD (which one homosexual “leader” on the West Coast URGED his fellow homosexuals to CONTINUE to attempt to contaminate in order to involve the straight community in the push to increase federal funding for AIDS research).

What a guy — er — GAY!


94 posted on 12/18/2013 7:46:44 AM PST by Dick Bachert (CONGRESS: GROW A PAIR! IMPEACH THE USURPER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

No matter how large their show...I will be the first to say it here. If the roar of the homosexual and dumbassed youth noise is loud enough
It will eventually bring down this show...mark my words

I do doubt Phil apologizes


95 posted on 12/18/2013 7:47:06 AM PST by wardaddy (choctaw bingo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON
( In my most "gay" vocalization) "Well, what do you expect from a bunch of rich rednecks who only hunt ducks!"


98 posted on 12/18/2013 7:54:56 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Here’s my shocked face

:O


99 posted on 12/18/2013 7:55:18 AM PST by AppyPappy (Obama: What did I not know and when did I not know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson