To: MrB
Maybe they didn't eat the animals that were skinned for their clothing? I don't see much difference between eating an wearing. And the story segued from A/E straight to Abel's sacrifice of meat, without much ado between.
But, I guess, if you insist, no direct permission was granted.
97 posted on
12/16/2013 12:51:08 PM PST by
Mamzelle
To: Mamzelle
Just doing some reading on the topic myself - Abel was accounted as righteous, therefore he obeyed God, and the command to that point was “herbs only”.
Now, that’s not to say that the sinful of the time didn’t eat meat.
99 posted on
12/16/2013 12:54:27 PM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Mamzelle
I don't see much difference between eating an wearing. you can wear the skin of an animal who died of old age, trauma,lightniung strike , whatever....you can also eat some of them.........if not too old!!!
167 posted on
12/16/2013 9:43:54 PM PST by
terycarl
(common sense rules overall)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson