[Dr. Thorne]

The judge in the criminal case threw out the charges. There's a good chance that the police did not have probable cause and only found out that the teen had recently left after they had entered illegally.

You don't know how long the criminal case took and jump to the conclusion that the lawsuit was filed in order to beat some unknown limitation.

I live in Post Falls. You clearly don't know anything about the case beside what you read. Why don't you try using your brains a little, would you?

[wideawake]

There's a good chance that the police did not have probable cause and only found out that the teen had recently left after they had entered illegally.

So they thought he wasn't there, but entered a home they didn't think he was in just to pass the time of day, and then - by sheer dumb luck - the guy they thought was never there actually happened to have been there?

No sale.

You don't know how long the criminal case took and jump to the conclusion that the lawsuit was filed in order to beat some unknown limitation.

The criminal case and this civil case have nothing to do with one another.

The fugitive could have been guilty as sin on multiple counts but if the complainant could show that the police had no inkling that the fugitive had been in their house, then there would be no probable cause for a search.

I live in Post Falls.

Of course you do.

And I'm sure you have intimate personal knowledge of all 28,000 souls living there and know all 11,000 private residences there like the back of your hand.

You clearly don't know anything about the case beside what you read.

As opposed to you, apparently.

Are you personally involved in the case?

Why don't you try using your brains a little, would you?

Apparently I have, since all you've got by way of counterargument is a variation on the "Do you know who I am?" routine.