Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo

Meh. That’s not how I do it.

I guess graphene based non-ionization radiation generation is OK, though, if you’re just starting out, but I’d be embarrassed to let anyone know I was doing it that way.


3 posted on 12/10/2013 4:54:33 PM PST by FLAMING DEATH (I'm not racist - I hate Biden too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: FLAMING DEATH

How would you do it, then?

We are at the point in LENR where patent wars are going to be going full swing. These guys have an unusual approach, which is an advantage in a patent war.


4 posted on 12/10/2013 5:11:33 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: FLAMING DEATH
"I guess graphene based non-ionization radiation generation is OK, though, if you’re just starting out, but I’d be embarrassed to let anyone know I was doing it that way."

The main "takeaway" from this patent is that modified carbon nanotubes can thermalize the energy from the 2D2 --> He4 reaction by direct conversion into the graphene matrix, rather than having it show up as kinetic energy in a high velocity alpha particle, as is the case in hot fusion.

This has major ramifications for the possibility of directly converting the fusion reaction energy directly into electric power.

12 posted on 12/11/2013 5:05:04 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson