Replies

Again, not wide enough to be a threat.
That v you are talking about is mostly volatiles.
A big yawn burger.
The dust likewise is a mostly yawnburger.
Look at the current November omega orionids.
They are a debris stream from a cometary source.
They are..a yawnburger.
Shows up real nice on radar.
But pathetic visually.
And that v ain’t aimed at us at all.
And won’t come anywhere near us.
Www.spaceweather.com for meteor shower info.

Well here's the deal - "mostly volatiles and dust" are things that form a cometary tail. Comet tails blow away from the sun, because the solar wind hits them, and because they are so light.

ISON's "debris" did not blow away from the sun after perihelion. That means this "debris" is too heavy to be affected by the solar wind. Is that what you meant by "mostly"? As in, all stuff you mentioned doesn't apply, because what you left out is what "mostly" applies?

And as for the spreading cone of "debris" travelling over a million miles a day, spanning over a million miles wide and still growing, I guess you're right - there's no possible way that the same sun that created that "debris" would be nearly strong enough to smack it so hard that it could spread 401 million miles wide by the time it gets here.

Not possible. The sun is just too weak to do that.

there's no possible way that the same sun that created that "debris" would be nearly strong enough to smack it so hard that it could spread 401 million miles wide by the time it gets here.

You have an interesting take on gravitational physics. I was not aware that the sun wielded a ball bat to "smack" anything with. IF that were so, then by your theory of physics implicit in your use of the word 'smack', the sun magically imparted some other form of energy not related to gravitational 'slingshot' affect or tidal forces. Even if the sun could smack the comet with your theoretical ball bat, it must also of necessity then be able to apply that smack in a somehow off axis path so as to impart some other 'direction' (ok.. angular momentum) to the resultant remnants from the flogging it gives the comet.

This postulation must be accepted as a tenet of faith on your part to allow thinking that the remnants of the smacked comet would disperse in a manner contrary to standard laws of physics.

Of course, while on the back side of the sun and unseen by us, Ison could have been manipulated by Zetans, Theatans, or Sleestacks or collided with Nibiru so as to impart widely divergent from standard Newtonian motion trajectories to these parts... If this is your position, then of course standard physical models fail. And you have a great deal of faith.

Unless you are willing to allow for an interjection of off-axis energy to the Ison 'system', that 'system' WILL maintain its original trajectory... The angular momentun that the 'system' possessed on one side of the sun will be identical on the other side of the sun, you just have to add 'em all up..

Quick Physics lesson...