[donmeaker]

Because we can not evaluate the eye witness, except when they make egregious falsehoods, such as an eclipse during the full moon, a star that hovers over a particular place on the ground, or even a virgin birth.

Then we can reject such testimony out of hand. Certainly a reporter who includes such impossibilities deserves derision, not belief.

[Elsie]

Then we can reject such testimony out of hand.

This statement shows the extend of your unbelief.

[Elsie]

Certainly a reporter who includes such impossibilities deserves derision, not belief.

Of COURSE they are 'impossible' - to you.

You seem to require DNA, YouTube videos and stereo, #3D holograms for 'proof'.