So Christianity asserts that created man, being perfect was made prone to sin.
So would G-d, being most perfect, be most prone to sin?
Or would man being more prone to sin than G-d be less than perfect/
If it was a novel, one would say it had too many plot holes, and would reject it. Since religion depends on believing multiple whoppers, all this is perfectly acceptable.
But it's NOT a novel: not even a novel strawman.
Man was not made prone to sin. He became prone to sin.
God created man with the ability to choose. Man had free will which he could exercise.
God could have created a world full of robots which had no choice but to serve and praise Him, but where is the love in that?
Love is not love if it is not freely given. It cannot be demanded nor programed into a being. For man to love God, he must do it of his own choosing.
Made was NOT created prone to sin, but was given the free will to continue in good or sin. After sinning man and world were infected with the propensity to sin.
“God created things which had free will. That means creatures which can go either wrong or right. Some people think they can imagine a creature which was free but had no possibility of going wrong; I cannot. If a thing is free to be good it is also free to be bad. And free will is what has made evil possible. Why, then, did God give them free will? Because free will, though it makes evil possible, is also the only thing that makes possible any love or goodness or joy worth having.”- C.S. Lewis (1898 – 1963)
I find it interesting that Darwinists deny the existence of free will. I can only conclude Darwin Religion teachers imply their students do not have the free will to not commit mass murder, hence two Colorado teenagers gun down their fellow students. Let us not forget it was the same survival of the fittest doctrine, which lead Hitler and Stalin to butcher millions. I suspect secular humanist teachers will soon be leading songs to the glory of Darwin.
So would G-d, being most perfect, be most prone to sin?
God is Holy and hates sin. That said, I never heard a Darwinist express hatred for sin. Indeed, most rejoice in evil. Let them all sing to the glory of Darwin.
If it was a novel, one would say it had too many plot holes, and would reject it. Since religion depends on believing multiple whoppers, all this is perfectly acceptable.
And the Darwinist continue fiddling, while their students dance to the glory of death.