Just because some, if not all, specifics happen to be correct, it doesnt mean that they point to the correct conclusion. It means that they point to one possible conclusion. Layers of analysis and quite frankly common sense (including things like application of Occams Razor) need to be added as well.
So again I’d raise the point that it makes absolutely no sense for Obama to embark on a plan that would essentially eliminate his political base (blacks, Hispanics and white liberals), leaving those he reviles to step into the power vacuum. Especially in a situation where the US military would still have the capability to nuke the rest of the world onto it’s knees.
Oh, and I had a typo in my earlier post. Should have been guy, not gay.
It makes all the sense in the world for Obama to do anything that would allow him to declare martial law. That is the end run for the whole coup. That completes the coup. In the cities there would be the violence but they can handle violence. In the rural areas the problems would be lack of food, gasoline, medicine... leading to starvation and disease. Obama can easily choose who gets medicine and food.
There is a reason that DHS has been amassing hollow-point bullets, tanks, and body bags. There is a reason that Napolitano said that a “natural disaster” was coming that would dwarf anything America has ever seen, and why a dem Congresswoman said there was 100% certainty of an EMP-type event.
China posted a map of the US showing what US cities could be nuked. They know they’re never going to get paid back on the US’s debt to them. There isn’t enough money in the world to pay them back. At some point - since the US is not willing to get serious about managing their debt - China will have to cut its losses and take the collateral, which happens to be US land and infrastructure. It’s no good to them unless they clear out the American people first though. And that’s what the old Columbia University talk groups with Bill Ayers and FBI mole Larry Grathwohl (who also died not too long ago...) were all about - discussing how to divide up the US to give to the communists in the world. I think Grathwohl talked about China, Russia, Viet Nam, and Cuba...
They talked about consigning some people to re-education camps. That can only happen fully under martial law. The confiscation of guns - which has always been the deterrent to a full communist coup - can only happen fully under martial law.
The steps to a successful coup HAVE to include martial law. To get nationwide martial law you’ve got to have something visible to everybody including the cities - something where those in the cities cry out for security - all over the country. What event would do that without wiping out any of Obama’s voting base? And truthfully, what difference does a voting base make when you set up a totalitarian state, which is the goal? Voters mean nothing to him. That could also explain why he’s been willing to let the unions - his voting base! - get royally ticked off with him over Obamacare. He doesn’t need them any more. He has “more flexibility” now.
I think you’re thinking inside the box, as if we were in normal electoral times. We’re not. Think Fast and Furious, Benghazi, Extortion 17, IRS, NSA, permission to kill American citizens on US soil without any due process or accountability, etc. The media was threatened in Oct of 2008 and since then what few reporters have shown any integrity at all have had computers, phone lines, etc violated. And none of that stuff kept Obama from (supposedly) being re-elected.
We’re operating in a post-1933-Germany world, after the Enabling Act allowed Hitler to do whatever he wanted including changing the German Constitution. We’re watching Obama systematically dismantle everything the US is, while Congress, law enforcement, the courts, etc all just stand there picking their noses.
The base is expendable. They’ve filled their purpose. They are volatile. Prone to violence. Unpredictable. Expensive and, basically, useless. It makes perfect sense that they would be disposed of.