Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So...
Little House on Unaka | November 19, 2013 | don-o

Posted on 11/19/2013 6:54:38 AM PST by don-o

I was taught that a preposition is a bad thing with which to end a sentence. I do not recall being taught about beginning a sentence with an adverb. I raise the matter, because recently I have heard an increasing use of the word “so” as the first word in a sentence in response to a question.

I first noticed this in Congressional hearings. Now I am hearing it on the radio. On NPR this morning there was a story about the relationship between commute to work times and political involvement. The interviewee spoke English well, with perhaps an Indian accent. In a five to eight minute piece, he began maybe five of his responses with “so”

My questions are:

1. Has anyone else noticed this?
2. Is it a new speech pattern?
3. How did it get started?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: grammarnazi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 11/19/2013 6:54:38 AM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: don-o

Yes, I’ve noticed it and it’s annoying.


2 posted on 11/19/2013 6:55:59 AM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

So what? :)


3 posted on 11/19/2013 6:56:39 AM PST by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Yeah, I’ve noticed it too, and it’s like nails on a chalkboard.


4 posted on 11/19/2013 6:58:50 AM PST by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

I’d say it’s a nearly universally understood—though often probably subconsciously—way to attempt to change the subject or redirect it more narrowly. I can’t think of another more succinct formula that accomplishes that.

HF


5 posted on 11/19/2013 7:00:27 AM PST by holden (Alter or abolish it yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

I’ve noticed it, and I’ve also noticed that it’s sometimes a signal that the upcoming answer is going to be irrelevant to the question.

It’s annoying, but not as annoying as “here’s the thing.”


6 posted on 11/19/2013 7:04:16 AM PST by rycharn (broadcasting live since 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holden
I’d say it’s a nearly universally understood—though often probably subconsciously—way to attempt to change the subject or redirect it more narrowly.

Actually I vote for OK.

I take it as a way of picking up from a statement made by someone else and drawing a conclusion from it. So, (LOL) the use of "so" is like the continuation of that statement and is used to emphasize that point.

And, have you noticed the increasing use of "and" as the first word in a sentence. I never do it but many others do. ;)

7 posted on 11/19/2013 7:04:48 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: holden

“So” also establishes what came before as settled “fact” (”taking this for granted we will now consider...”).

In Japanese, I was taught that if you make a presumptive statement, you should end it with “isn’t that so?”.


8 posted on 11/19/2013 7:04:52 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: don-o

I have noticed that as well. I have also noticed people using the word “literally” incorrectly/and commonly. “I was literally sick to my stomach” or “I literally had to sit down” (both cases NOT involving throwing up or having to sit down). A pet peeve of mine...


9 posted on 11/19/2013 7:05:59 AM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

So I am, like, so with you.


10 posted on 11/19/2013 7:06:47 AM PST by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

I think of Pink Floyd.

“So”


11 posted on 11/19/2013 7:07:35 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holden

I have never really given it much thought and have been trying to reflect on my own behavior. I do a lot of speaking.

I can see where it would indicate a continuance of thought from one person to another. But I have to agree, now that I think about it.

So, in line with your thinking, speculatively assuming that your premise is true and the inquiry is righteous, I guess I agree.


12 posted on 11/19/2013 7:08:18 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Liberals can afford for things to go well, to work, for folks to be happy. They'd be out of work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: holden
I’d say it’s a nearly universally understood—though often probably subconsciously—way to attempt to change the subject or redirect it more narrowly.

In political matters, I think you are correct. However, in the discussion of commute times, the fellow was being responsive to the question. It was as if he were substituting "so" for "uh." The problem with that is that "so" is a real word with rules for proper usage. "Uh" (as per Obama) is a time filler to craft out the next lie.

13 posted on 11/19/2013 7:09:39 AM PST by don-o (Hit the FReepathon hard and fast! Nail this one for the Jimmer. Do it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

... speculatively assuming that your premise is true and the inquiry is righteous”

Now you’ve done gone and used big words on us. :)


14 posted on 11/19/2013 7:10:23 AM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: don-o

This reminds me of the story of the little boy who, upstairs sick in bed, asked his mother, “What did you bring this book I wanted to be read to out of up for?”


15 posted on 11/19/2013 7:14:10 AM PST by FNU LNU (Nothing runs like a Deere, nothing smells like a john)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momtothree
Now you’ve done gone and used big words on us. :)

One of the things that originally attracted me to this board was the opportunity to hone my written communication skill. I do not know if I have made much progress. I do recall "back in the day" an ungrammatical usage or a misspelled word would get you noticed and dismissed as not a serious person.

Maybe all those people got the zot.

16 posted on 11/19/2013 7:14:51 AM PST by don-o (Hit the FReepathon hard and fast! Nail this one for the Jimmer. Do it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Lot’s of grammar is being ignored because of the internet. Using “so” to start a response, is more like finishing the questioner’s thought for them, restating what the other person has said and re-interpreting it at the same. James Taranto at the WSJ used a word for this concept, but I’ll be darned if I remember it. I had to look it up at the time. It is meant to be a trick, that’s why it is annoying.


17 posted on 11/19/2013 7:15:16 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

So like, when someone says “so”, OK, like, every few words OK, that like, bothers you? So, what are you, OK, like picky? Right?

There are things that bother me a whole lot more than “so”.

The interview with Caroline Kennedy comes to mind, OK?


18 posted on 11/19/2013 7:15:48 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FNU LNU; Mrs. Don-o
“What did you bring this book I wanted to be read to out of up for?”

He could have simply asked "Why did you throw me upstairs my book?"

19 posted on 11/19/2013 7:17:20 AM PST by don-o (Hit the FReepathon hard and fast! Nail this one for the Jimmer. Do it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Yes, I have also noticed it. It seems that “so” is being used to begin sentences more often these days, and “like” is being used less frequently.

I do not believe that schools are putting enough (for our preferences and sensibilities, anyway) emphasis on proper usage and grammar.

I doubt this situation will ever improve, with the broad acceptance of ethnic speech patterns and all of the social media impacts on language and communications.


20 posted on 11/19/2013 7:17:40 AM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson