Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

Why is it that an organization that is supposed to be dedicated to preparing our country for response to DISEASE and all that goes with finds itself needing to do “studies” on guns and gun violence, domestic violence and all the other politically-correct topics? Why is that?

It is because of Funding. Government funding. CREATE a problem, condition or disaster and then herald the need through a complicit media to garner MORE funding. This is THE problem with academia today. Publish or perish. Get outside funding or die. Justify yourself, even if you have to whore out your credentials with the media equivalent of a back alley bl@w job It means comfortable [deserved] survival in a world that can’t understand why you can’t really do anything worthwhile like fix a toilet leak or change a fuse, or figure out why your can has that knocking song.


2 posted on 11/04/2013 9:09:07 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

And to top it off, I might add that the very place desperate humans surviving the most famous zombie outbreak, “The Walking Dead,” went to for salvation was a CDC center and they ended up getting nothing.

The truth is that if/when a biological disaster hits, the CDC will collapse.


3 posted on 11/04/2013 9:11:21 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer
From the article:However, data reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show that firearm-related deaths among persons aged 0-14 years actually decreased 39 percent from 1997 to 2009, and decreased 45 percent if the trend is carried through 2010, the most recent year for which data are available.

It is the American Academy of Pediatrics who did not peer review the material, or it is the cherry picking of data classes to make the info fit the desired (misleading) narrative by the doctors, not the CDC who are to blame.

Note that in the abstract "Arin L. Madenci and Christopher B. Weldon, claims that from 1997 to 2009, in-hospital deaths of children resulting from gunshot wounds increased nearly 60 percent, and hospitalizations of children for gunshot wounds increased 80 percent." (emphasis mine).

As usual, we don't know where the cutoff age for children is for these doctors, it might be 26, nor whether these wounds were the result of people (including police) defending against criminal activity, which would include a large number of perps in the line of fire. Taking data which include intentional shootings by those defending property or life against criminal activity and including the criminals as wounded or dead children (within the age bracket), would inflate the numbers. Presenting that as 'accidental' would make it appear there is a growing problem, when in fact reality is the opposite.

4 posted on 11/04/2013 9:28:31 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer
Why is it that an organization that is supposed to be dedicated to preparing our country for response to DISEASE and all that goes with finds itself needing to do “studies” on guns and gun violence, domestic violence and all the other politically-correct topics? Why is that?

Simple and accurate answer : Hussein, the "if I like your health insurance, you can keep it. period." doofus is running everything!

7 posted on 11/04/2013 10:08:11 AM PST by publius911 (At least Nixon had the good grace to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson