Criticizing Obongo for his speech patterns is nit picking. Criticizing Obongo for playing too much golf is nit picking.
Exposing Obongo for collaborating with Al Qaeda, for using the IRS to go after political enemies, for shipping weapons to Mexican drug cartels, for lying to the American people to get odious legislation passed.
These, and many other things, ARE NOT NIT PICKING.
No, Bill O’Reilly, in 8 years, Bush was never cut a break. What makes you think Obongo should not get the same treatment?
Is it because you think that, as a (half) black, he should be held to a lower standard?
No, Bill O’Reilly, in 8 years, Bush was never cut a break. What makes you think Obongo should not get the same treatment?
Is it because you think that, as a (half) black, he should be held to a lower standard?
...in order for these two sentences to logically follow each other, it requires showing BOR to hypercritical and utterly derogatory of Dubya as the sitting POTUS; and then on the other hand, going soft on Obama...we know that not to be true, Bill was measured in his commentary on Bush, as he is towards Obama...
...commentary on a POTUS is, of course, grounds for sharp political discourse...as long as that sharp discourse has a rational core of thought behind it...I find it odd that someone be pilloried simply because his commentary is not sufficiently derogatory...