The book
Who Built the Moon? has fascinating information about the moon:
Christopher Knight and Alan Butler realized that the ancient system of geometry they presented in their earlier, breakthrough study works as perfectly for the Moon as it does the Earth. They found a consistent sequence of integer numbers that they can apply to every major aspect of the Moon; no such pattern emerges for any other planet or moon in the solar system. In addition, Knight and Butler discovered that the Moon possesses few or no heavy metals and has no core—something that should not be possible. Their persuasive conclusion: if higher life only developed on Earth because the Moon is exactly what it is and where it is, it becomes unreasonable to cling to the idea that the Moon is a natural object—an idea with profound implications.
1 posted on
10/30/2013 4:56:19 PM PDT by
lasereye
To: lasereye
2 posted on
10/30/2013 5:09:19 PM PDT by
HeartlandOfAmerica
(OCare: 500 million lines of code (it took just 500 thousand lines of code to send a rover to Mars))
To: lasereye; SunkenCiv
this is a message from sitchin proving houdini was a fake
To: lasereye
Why must the term “secular” be injected into this argument?
To: lasereye
It is the effects on the tides that the Moon has its greatest significance. Because of the tides, life moved from the sea to the land. That adaptation gave rise to such things as cockroaches and mammalian life forms.
6 posted on
10/30/2013 5:21:01 PM PDT by
jonrick46
(The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
To: lasereye
* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research. That is up there with being the best yodeler in Harlem.
7 posted on
10/30/2013 5:23:00 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
(Fight Tapinophobia in all its forms! Do not submit to arduus privilege.)
To: lasereye
and the lesser light to rule the night.Jimmy Kimmel?
16 posted on
10/30/2013 6:20:05 PM PDT by
Misterioso
("There is nothing so naive as cynicism." - Ayn Rand)
To: lasereye
17 posted on
10/30/2013 6:21:11 PM PDT by
outofsalt
("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
To: lasereye
Why can't the third hypothesis be true, but then something collided with the earth later to knock it off its axis?
-PJ
26 posted on
10/30/2013 7:03:50 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: lasereye
Some of the debris launched into orbit around Earth and somehow collected to form the moon. Lol. Has whoever wrote this never heard about gravity? It is a property of all matter... it shouldn't be such a mystery that its action should be characterized as "somehow."
27 posted on
10/30/2013 7:41:51 PM PDT by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
To: lasereye
And its snap your finger time again!!!!!!!
To: lasereye
Does the Institute for Creation Research actually do any research?
31 posted on
11/01/2013 1:40:41 AM PDT by
Natufian
(t)
To: lasereye
Obi-Wan: That’s no moon. It’s a space station.
32 posted on
11/01/2013 1:53:38 AM PDT by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson