No it's not.It might be possible to adore one's kids,parents,spouse and siblings without being a Marxist but it's not possible for one to adore one animal,50 animals or animals in general without being either a Marxist or being out of his/her tiny little mind,a possibility I failed to mention in this case.But to me "showbiz" + "50 dogs rampaging through the house" = "Marxist" unless and until I see convincing evidence of serious mental or neurological illness.
OK, does “love” or “feel great compassion for” suit you better as terminology for people who are warmly devoted to animals? By your definition I and many other Freepers must be either Marxists or out of our tiny little minds since we do love animals, while still maintaining very close, healthy, and loving relationships with our children, spouses, and other family members. Most of us do not have the real estate or the staff to care for so many creatures, but we take in the rescues we can, and it’s a good thing that someone does have the time, space, money, and staff so that abandoned and abused animals don’t just die.
You may be a nice person in real life but to be quite honest you’re not making yourself sound like it in these posts. There’s no evidence at all, from any source, that Doris Day is a Marxist filthbag, and continuing to maintain that someone who does animal rescue is vile simply because you don’t care for animals is more than a bit cold.
Brigette Bardot is a far-right activist. Hardly a Marxist.
But to me “showbiz” + “50 dogs rampaging through the house” = “Marxist” unless and until I see convincing evidence of serious mental or neurological illness.
...my, my, you are quite the ranter, aren’t you...?
...but you don’t have to wait until someone digs up dirt on poor old Doris to see ‘convincing evidence of neurological illness’...just read your own posts...