No, that’s not exactly what the author is saying, or is not all the author was saying.
And that’s beside the point....so I’ll type slowly for you.
He used math that proves liberals will always win every election for ever and ever.....and THAT Was MY
ONLY
POINT.
slow enough for you?
Liberals will not win if the numbers they are providing the slave/voter masses do not add up. Most people with any sense of self (even a stupid self) will not live on the teat forever, nor do they wish to pay for it with their money (not as much problem with someone elses money paying for it— but then the “somebody else” eventually cannot manage it, no matter how much borrowed or QE money is given them).
He used ‘math’ to prove that the system can not continue on its present path and he has thru previous articles shown that via exponential math the takers ‘growth’ over the last 30 years is unsustainable. That ‘growth’ has occurred irregardless of whom was in power. Hence, the author wishes to not contribute to the system that math says MUST collapse. You still seem to think that R equates to ‘conservative’. Good luck with that. Forgive me if I still don’t seem to understand as I am/was a government employee and am ‘slow’...........