He used ‘math’ to prove that the system can not continue on its present path and he has thru previous articles shown that via exponential math the takers ‘growth’ over the last 30 years is unsustainable. That ‘growth’ has occurred irregardless of whom was in power. Hence, the author wishes to not contribute to the system that math says MUST collapse. You still seem to think that R equates to ‘conservative’. Good luck with that. Forgive me if I still don’t seem to understand as I am/was a government employee and am ‘slow’...........
You are probably the author....and yet, you have zero understanding of the point I am trying to make. I will no longer cast my pearls before swine.......you simply cannot understand the written word.