Here is the story on your “rest of the story”
“This is, of course, pure speculation, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Scott, a seemingly white man, feared these teens because they were nonwhite and therefore considered inherently violent.
On a side note, I realize Scott doesn’t necessarily look white,(He is obviously black) but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t benefit from white supremacy/privilege that our criminal justice system was built on, especially given that his victim was a young black male.”
This whole incident is black on black violence, yet the author blames “white supremacy/privilege” for the verdict! The author destroys her credibility with this absurd charge even if some of her other points are valid.
But then, in the eyes of guilt tripping white “liberals”, whites are to blame for EVERYTHING bad that happens to black people.
“feared these teens because they were nonwhite and therefore considered inherently violent”
Statistically, how would this be an erroneous consideration?