Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: servo1969

Doesn’t look like a 57 Chev in the background. More like a 51 Chev. Just MHO.


4 posted on 09/18/2013 3:38:03 AM PDT by duckman (I'm part of the group pulling the wagon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: duckman

“Doesn’t look like a 57 Chev in the background. More like a 51 Chev. Just MHO.”

The plate probably was from ‘57. I agree. It does not appear to be a ‘57.


7 posted on 09/18/2013 3:48:12 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: duckman

It seems like either a ‘51 or a ‘52.

It has split windshield,so it is not a ‘53, which had a one piece windshield.

I am very curious about the damage on the Camaro.

The front is not damaged, but the rear is horribly mangled. Impact with the water did not do that.

At the news source link, there are pictures of this same
Camaro in 1970.


12 posted on 09/18/2013 3:54:48 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson