Please read my response in #51 above.
I assert that every issue raised by your web site is answered in my recommended introductory book:
And if you dispute my claim, then you must read the book, and post here any of "your detailed, logical, believable" responses.
Until you do, I will rightly assume that you now totally agree with Scott, and utterly reject the issues raised in your own pathetic web site -- isn't that fair?
Well, OK, if you don't like that, then explain to us in what way, exactly, is my demand different from yours?
OK...I have a copy of the book. I have begun perusing it, but was wondering if you have read the whole thing? Just curious.