Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise

I was just a kid in the 60s, but I do know the teenagers and young adults of that time had no use for any music that was pre-1964. I think it’s very two-faced of the teenagers of that era to now act like their music is somehow sacred and above criticism. Back in the 60s, Glen Miller was scoffed at. Guess what? The Beatles are more out of date now than Glen Miller was in the 60s. And go to the 50 year Class of 1964 reunions next summer and see how many of them have Pete Seeger records. The 60s kids were duped into believing that a four piece band with three types of instruments could make music as rich and complex as a symphony orchestra. They were sold music on the cheap. OK. But it’s not timeless and sacred.


79 posted on 08/29/2013 12:13:07 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: blueunicorn6

There are people who won’t move on from Led Zepplin either. Robert Plant and Jimmy Page sure wish they would.

In the press conference for It Might Get Loud (a bonus on the DVD), every question posed to Jimmy Page is “so when is there going to be a new Led Zepplin album?” “When is Led Zepplin going to get back together and tour?”


80 posted on 08/29/2013 12:23:24 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson