Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pension criticism=racism. Aaauugghh! Aaauugghh! Aaauugghh!
Cal Watchdog ^ | 08/14/2013 | Chris Reed

Posted on 08/19/2013 9:06:29 AM PDT by Rusty0604

when it comes to public employee benefits and the damage they wreak on local governments, scoundrels have another refuge: blaming racism for concerns about lavish, unaffordable benefits and broken governments. ”Public-sector workers are disproportionately black. In 2011, about 19 percent of black workers were employed by the government, compared with 14 percent of whites and 10 percent of Hispanics. The upshot is pretty clear: Reducing the value of public pensions and other benefits wouldn’t just hurt blacks disproportionately; it would do so at a time when other economic trends have already hurt them more than most. So the question isn’t whether race is part of the debate over public pensions, but how to address it.”

(Excerpt) Read more at calwatchdog.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bailouts; classenvy; gimmedats; lifetimesalary; pensions; publicdole; publicworkers; racism; retirement; welfarestate

1 posted on 08/19/2013 9:06:29 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Is this an addmission that Public Sector Union members are unqualified staff with non-value added jobs?

BUT, you ask, “If the job is non-value added, how could someone possibly be unqualified?”


2 posted on 08/19/2013 9:17:41 AM PDT by G Larry (Let his days be few; and let another take his office. Psalms 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Is this an addmission that Public Sector Union members are unqualified staff with non-value added jobs?

BUT, you ask, “If the job is non-value added, how could someone possibly be unqualified?”


3 posted on 08/19/2013 9:17:50 AM PDT by G Larry (Let his days be few; and let another take his office. Psalms 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

I believe it is racist that blacks have a disproportionate share of government positions. They should be fired and replaced in exact proportion by those of other races.


4 posted on 08/19/2013 9:25:02 AM PDT by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
Reducing the value of public pensions and other benefits wouldn’t just hurt blacks disproportionately; it would do so at a time when other economic trends have already hurt them more than most.

Really? How many government "jobs" have been downsized, outsourced, cut to part time or otherwise compromised? (crickets)

5 posted on 08/19/2013 9:26:14 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Just let people complain, who cares! They earned the pension so just ignore the naysayers.


6 posted on 08/19/2013 9:26:35 AM PDT by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
Aaauugghh! Aaauugghh! Aaauugghh!

Love the homage to Sam Kinison...

7 posted on 08/19/2013 9:29:41 AM PDT by Old Sarge (Opinions are like orgasms: only mine count, and I couldn't care less if you have one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

But if there is not money there to pay the pension benefits, WHO SHOULD PAY FOR IT? Please provide details of your proposed solution.


8 posted on 08/19/2013 9:39:50 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge; Rusty0604

“Aaauugghh! Aaauugghh! Aaauugghh!
Love the homage to Sam Kinison... “

I miss Sam, Aaauugghh! Aaauugghh! Aaauugghh!


9 posted on 08/19/2013 9:43:46 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE (“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever.” - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

The naysayers are the taxpayers that have to pay for their own retirement.


10 posted on 08/19/2013 9:49:45 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

The naysayers are the taxpayers that have to pay for their own retirement.


11 posted on 08/19/2013 9:49:59 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson