Skip to comments.
New peer review:  only 36% of geoscientists and engineers believe in AGW
WUWT VH ^
 | 8/13/2013
 | Anthony Watts
Posted on 08/13/2013 9:40:04 AM PDT by Signalman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21 next  last
    
1
posted on 
08/13/2013 9:40:04 AM PDT
by 
Signalman
 
To: Signalman
    Oops, looks like we will soon be told, “It was never about consensus.”
2
posted on 
08/13/2013 9:41:16 AM PDT
by 
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
 
To: Signalman
3
posted on 
08/13/2013 9:45:17 AM PDT
by 
jimfree
(In November 2016 my 13 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
 
To: Signalman
    Bump to read later when Freerepublic is hopefully working right
 
4
posted on 
08/13/2013 9:46:10 AM PDT
by 
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
 
To: qam1
    That is called the “overwhelming” consensus
 
5
posted on 
08/13/2013 9:47:14 AM PDT
by 
GeronL
 
To: Signalman
    I wonder if there is any correlation between ‘scientists’ who believe in AGW and low GPA in college
 
6
posted on 
08/13/2013 9:50:14 AM PDT
by 
Mr. K
(Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
 
To: Signalman
    So it looks like a landslide victory - over 64% of scientists say it is not true.
So, we have a consensus
 
7
posted on 
08/13/2013 9:51:32 AM PDT
by 
Mr. K
(Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
 
To: Signalman
    I’m one geoscientist who believes AGW is a bunch of 0bama.
 
8
posted on 
08/13/2013 9:52:11 AM PDT
by 
Godzilla
(3/7/77)
 
To: qam1
    Bump to read later when Freerepublic is hopefully working right I thought it was my computer. Can't scroll very far. You?
 
9
posted on 
08/13/2013 9:52:26 AM PDT
by 
Tenacious 1
(Waiting for next tagline.)
 
To: jimfree
    So 64% of them just like dirty air and water, that’s all that means.
 
10
posted on 
08/13/2013 9:52:52 AM PDT
by 
Mr. K
(Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
 
To: Signalman
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.   -- Voltaire
11
posted on 
08/13/2013 9:57:23 AM PDT
by 
meadsjn
 
To: Signalman
    Times change and so do conditions based on some phenomena determined by the Creator. Some people want whats been created to be what they want it to be. There is another group to which I as a Chm. Eng. belong that says/believes that what was and is being created is God’s work for us to try and figure out and to live with such.
 
To: Signalman
    I must have forgotten more of my high school science lessons than I had realized. Where does ‘consensus’ fit in the scientific method? While I’m fairly sure that hypothesis still comes first, does the ‘consensus’ step come before or after doing experiments?
 
13
posted on 
08/13/2013 10:00:54 AM PDT
by 
Bob
 
To: Signalman
    Temperatures rising: caused by global warming
 Temperatures falling: caused by global warming
 More storms: caused by global warming
 Fewer storms: caused by global warming
 Lack of consensus on global warming: caused by global warming
 
14
posted on 
08/13/2013 10:05:40 AM PDT
by 
thesharkboy
(posting without reading the article since 1998)
 
To: SampleMan
    Yup. The old lies will go straight down the media’s “memory hole.”
 
15
posted on 
08/13/2013 10:39:41 AM PDT
by 
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact.  It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
 
To: Signalman
    "...a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming..." Only problem is, there's a growing consensus among climatologists, including the British Meteorological Office, that there hasn't been any damn gloBULL warming at all since 1997!
 Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
 
16
posted on 
08/13/2013 10:55:10 AM PDT
by 
wku man
(Amnesty?  No Way, Jose (No Se Puede!) by 10 Pound Test  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsTUQ8yOI2c)
 
To: Signalman
    Global warming is a ruse. The attempt to change the terminology to "climate change" proves that the promoters of the idea know it is a ruse. By changing the term to "climate change", they can blame any variance from the norm on carbon emissions.
More tornadoes this year? Climate change.
Fewer tornadoes this year? Climate change.
No rain? Climate change.
Torrental rains and flooding? Climate change.
It's ridiculous how many people have bought into ths nonsense.
 
17
posted on 
08/13/2013 11:13:58 AM PDT
by 
MEGoody
(You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
 
To: GeronL
    Consensus IS science. So said the world’s expert, Algore, AKA Manbearpig.
He also knows the Earth’s core is millions of degrees.
 
18
posted on 
08/13/2013 11:38:42 AM PDT
by 
TurboZamboni
(Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
 
To: MEGoody
    It only appeared different because of the RADICAL LEFTIST PROPAGANDA of lies from Gore and company, who are still trying to cling to the scam even though AGW is AWOL
 
19
posted on 
08/13/2013 11:41:38 AM PDT
by 
spawn44
(MOO)
 
To: TurboZamboni
    The science of consensus. lol
twinkles up.
heh
 
20
posted on 
08/13/2013 12:00:55 PM PDT
by 
GeronL
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson